Geodesics on a Circular Cylinder: Solving Ch6 Q6.4

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Geodesic
physics_fun
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm working on marion&thornton ch6 question 6.4.
"Show that the geodesic on the surface of a straight circular cylinder is a (partial) helix"

I used the example of the geodesic on a sphere in the book, but when i calculate the angle phi i get something like phi=b*z+c, where b and c are constants; this is a straight line?!
Or does it just mean that the 'speed' of phi doesn't change in time??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phi changes linearly with z. Think about the implications of this.
 
That implies the equation should be linear...and it is!
Thanks!:smile:
 
I still don't think you got what I meant. The equation you came up with shows a linear change in phi with z. Now imagine a cylinder that has a line drawn on its inside surface that changes linearly by 2pi over the total length z. The line drawn on the inside would be part of a helix.

Just making sure you can visualise that.
 
I think that's just what I meant to say (my English is not always very good...):smile:
 
No problem. English is my first language and I struggle to express myself :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top