Geomagnetic Field Reversal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lacy33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
Current research indicates that geomagnetic field reversals (GFR) have occurred throughout Earth's history, with the last significant reversal, the Brunhes Normal Chron, beginning approximately 780,000 years ago. Leading scientists suggest that while there have been numerous magnetic reversals, humanoid life has not been significantly influenced by the last reversal. The geological record shows at least 12 magnetic reversals in the last 4 million years, with the Matuyama Reverse Chron preceding the Brunhes. Although statistical models indicate we may be overdue for another reversal, the unpredictability of these events makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, there is ongoing debate regarding the relationship between geomagnetic excursions and climate changes, including ice ages and cosmic radiation effects. Overall, the scientific community continues to explore the implications of GFRs on Earth's history and life.
Lacy33
Messages
242
Reaction score
1
Without pulling out the paper I wrote 10 some years ago discussing the geomagnetic field reversal, I would like to know what current data analysis agrees on about the following:
From journals, Nature and Science back as many years ago, I found the science community speculating that at the time of a reversal, GFR, things on the planet changed, such as the emergence of man, the disappearance of certain creatures.
In other words signifigant events in world history.
Is this still a belief of leading researchers?

Thank you,
Suzanne Elizabeth Seitz

Also posted in Astronomy & Cosmology section.
 
Last edited:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Ive looked this up and no link seems to exist.

Humanoid life has not been influenced by the last mafnetic reversal for as far as is presently known.
 
Nerro said:
Ive looked this up and no link seems to exist.

Humanoid life has not been influenced by the last mafnetic reversal for as far as is presently known.


Thank you.

Since you looked it up, when was the last GFR?
And did it say when we are due for another?
Please.

S
 
I think statistically we are overdue for another reversal, but I'm not sure about this. I don't have a link though, I remember my geology lecturer presenting some data when I was studying this 6 months ago.

The last field reversal was 780,000 years ago, beginning the Brunhes Normal Chron. That was preceeded by the Matuyama Reverse Chron which began 2.5million years ago. There have been at least 12 magnetic reversals in the last 4 million years, as each chron (a period where the magnetic field is predominantely in one direction) is interspersed with short periods of the opposite field direction. From memory the Matuyama Chron had 3 or 4 of these, but we haven't had one during the Brunhes.
 
Considering that there have been super-chrons of tens of millions years, statistics have no meaning I'd say. To be more precieze the last chrons are: Brunhes -0.789 Mya- Matuyama - 2.581 Mya - Gauss - 3.58 Mya - Gilbert

Although Brunhes has no subchrons, there have been many more geomagnetic excursions, a collapse of the magnetic field, hardly known of the orther chrons, There is mild dispute whether those excursions are related to ice age climate and or cosmogenic radioactivity.

http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/inqu/finalprogram/abstract_54960.htm says yes,
but this one says no.
 
Thank you to all.

This has been very valuble to me and am already making my way back into this area if investigation.

S
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top