German contributions to aviation

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Mcrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aviation German
AI Thread Summary
Germany's contributions to aviation are significant, particularly in aerodynamics and early jet engine development, with notable figures like Ludwig Prandtl and Pabst von Ohain. However, the assertion that all modern aircraft are based on German systems is considered exaggerated, as many foundational technologies originated from American and British innovations. Post-World War II, German scientists were sought after by both the U.S. and Russia, but their contributions are often idolized without sufficient basis. Current military restrictions stemming from WWII still impact Germany's aviation industry, but it remains a key player in NATO air forces. Overall, while Germany has a rich aviation history, its current standing compared to other nations is complex and multifaceted.
John Mcrain
Messages
435
Reaction score
28
I read lots of comments,text like this:"American, Russian or European,aircrafts all of them are German systems, ideas, experiences and technologies After World War II, Russia and America offered German scientists, engineers and researchers asylum and work under their supervision or punished with symbols of the Hitler regime, so most of them emigrated Scholars to those countries, the pride of German industry that astonished the world in the last century, Great Germany, had it not been for the sanctions on military industrialization, no one would have estimated it"

Also that Germans set basics of aerodynamics,Ludwing Prandtl, Max Munk , Dr. Woldemar Voigt , Dr. Adolph Busemann ,Dr. Richard Vogt, etc..

What do you think about contribution of Germany to aviation and how strong is Germany today compare to other countrys?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
John Mcrain said:
What do you think about contribution of Germany to aviation ...
Germany made major contributions to aviation but the statement
American, Russian or European,aircrafts all of them are German systems, ideas, experiences and technologies
is utterly absurd.

Germany learned rocketry from Robert Goddard, an American. A Brit (Frank Whittle) invented the modern jet engine. Others made major contributions as well.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Leo Liu, Dr.D and 1 other person
The jet engine was independently invented by Pabst von Ohain in Germany, but no question Goddard was 'the' rocket pioneer.
 
etudiant said:
The jet engine was independently invented by Pabst von Ohain in Germany, but no question Goddard was 'the' rocket pioneer.
Yeah, I vaguely remembered that a German had co-invented the jet and should have mentioned it but my point remains valid.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
phinds said:
Yeah, I vaguely remembered that a German had co-invented the jet and should have mentioned it but my point remains valid.
How is Germany today compare to others aviation-countrys,if you must make TOP 5?
Do they still has military restrictions because of world war 2?
 
John Mcrain said:
American, Russian or European, aircrafts all of them are German systems...
Don't take this kind of thing seriously. While it's true that during the WWII some things in Germany was a bit ahead their time and this made scientists from Germany a rare and sought after commodity once the war ended, the actual contribution is seriously overestimated. It's a kind of idolization without much real basis.

Especially when the topic is limited to aviation. For example their submarines made far more impact on the subsequent designs of the winners. At least as far as I know.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Why does it matter who are the top contributors to aviation now or historically? How do you even measure that? Total research output? Total "innovation?" Total expenditures? Any of those things but on a per capita basis?
 
  • Like
Likes rude man, berkeman and phinds
I agree w/ Dr. Strangelove. What's the point of the question?
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad
Will an anecdote suffice? In my youth I helped conduct electronic warfare exercises as an aggressor against NATO air forces circa 1970's. After several years conducting missions, I developed personal (non-scientific) rankings of participating air forces.
  1. USAF -- specifically Colorado national guard, contained the best fighter pilots, most Vietnam War veterans. Very difficult to defend against.
  2. RAF -- boldest bomber pilots in NATO, flew so low that dust obscured radar and visual returns. Formidable tactics.
  3. Luftwaffe -- highly coordinated operations and always tricky tactics.
In my professional opinion the Luftwaffe and RAF of those times were well matched. I give the RAF a slight nudge for their spectacular low level bombing techniques but the Luftwaffe pilots were highly skilled in electronic warfare and counter-measures. While these exercises predated German reunification, the Luftwaffe is/was a major contributor to NATO air forces.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, Astronuc and berkeman
  • #10
phinds said:
I agree w/ Dr. Strangelove
LOL :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad
  • #11
@John Mcrain you have been asked a question. Twice. On this forum, it's considered good form to answer a question when you are asked.
phinds said:
I agree w/ Dr. Strangelove. What's the point of the question?
 
  • #12
One of the major German contributions from the 1930s was S.F. Hoerner's books, Fluid Dynamic Drag, and Fluid Dynamic Lift. The contain vast amounts of empirical data.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top