Gibbs Phenomenon: Impact on kth Harmonics for Bandwidth Selection

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldfronts1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gibbs Phenomenon
AI Thread Summary
The Gibbs Phenomenon affects the selection of kth harmonics by causing poor convergence near discontinuities, resulting in persistent overshoot errors regardless of the number of harmonics used. As the number of harmonics increases, the waveform approximates the original square wave more closely in a mean square sense, but the maximum error near edges remains constant. Tapering the Fourier series with a windowing technique, such as a Hamming window, can significantly reduce ringing artifacts. The choice between using fewer harmonics for lower bandwidth versus more for better accuracy involves a trade-off, as both approaches still exhibit Gibbs Phenomenon effects. Ultimately, the decision on the optimal number of harmonics depends on the specific requirements for signal fidelity and bandwidth efficiency.
goldfronts1
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
How does the Gibbs Phenomenon effect the choice of the kth harmonics for bandwidth selection?

Basically, I have plotted a square wave using the Fourier series analysis for choosing the kth harmonics. As, I increase the kth harmonics the oscillations increase. What is the smallest harmonic i can go to that is still an accurate representation of the signal. Or does it not matter.

Confused

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
As the number of harmonics (N) increases the resultant waveform becomes progressively closer (in the sense of mean square difference) to the original square wave. Gibbs phenomenon refers to the fact that, despite getting ever closer in a mean squared sense, the convergence is very poor near the discontinuity (the edge) and in fact the maximum error at the "ringing overshoot" doesn't actually get any smaller as you increase N.

Tapering (instead of abruptly truncating) the truncated Fourier series (also called "windowing") is a very useful method for reducing these ringing artefacts. For example you could taper off the series with a "Hamming" type of window using something like : w(k) = 0.54 + 0.46 \cos( (k-1)\pi/(N-1) )

In other words, instead of using \sin(2 \pi (2k-1) t)/(2k-1) for the k-th term in the series you would use w(k) \sin(2 \pi (2k-1) t)/(2k-1) instead. Give it a try, you'll be surprised what a big improvement it makes.
 
The attachment shows a 20 term (sine) Fourier series for a square wave, both with and without windowing being used. The window I used was w(k) as defined in the previous post.
 

Attachments

  • windowed_fourier.png
    windowed_fourier.png
    9.4 KB · Views: 492
Ok, so what's the difference if I use 60 terms, which gives me about 99% of the power in the signal versus using 20 terms which gives me about 95% of the power in the signal? When the ultimate goal is to have the smallest bandwidth. I guess the gibbs phenomenon is still present in either case, but the signal is closer to the original when you use more k-terms, but that uses up more bandwidth. Is this just a judgment call? I guess which one is best?
 
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top