Given 2 indexes of refraction, how do I figure out thickness of oil

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the thickness of an oil film given its refractive index (1.16) and the refractive index of water (1.33), the formula t = mλ/2noil is used, resulting in a thickness of 172.4 nm for the first order (m = 1). The wavelength of violet light (400 nm) is relevant as it helps determine the conditions for constructive interference. Phase reversal occurs when light reflects off a boundary where the refractive index increases, causing a 180° phase shift. This phase shift must be considered when determining if the total phase difference is a multiple of 360° for constructive interference to occur. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving related optical problems effectively.
riseofphoenix
Messages
294
Reaction score
2
Number6-2_zpseb0dc8ad.png


:(:(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi riseofphoenix! :wink:

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi riseofphoenix! :wink:

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:

Given:
noil = 1.16
nwater = 1.33
λviolet = 400 nm - Question 1: why did they give me this if i didn't have to use it?
m = 1 (first order) - Question 2: what do they mean by the term "first order"? I never understand :(
t = ?

Equation to use:

2noilt = mλ
t = mλ/2noil
t = (1)(400 nm) / 2(1.16)
t = 400/2.32
t = 172.4 nm

I did it based off of this:

PhysicsSolution_zpse0f852b5.png


I don't understand their explanation though :(:(:(

Particularly this part: "Since nair < nair < nwater, light reflected from both top and bottom surfaces of the oil film experiences phase reversal."

Question 3: What's phase reversal??
Question 4: And why is this considered "constructive interference"? :(
 
Last edited:
:'( *sadface*
 
hi riseofphoenix! :smile:
riseofphoenix said:
Question 1: why did they give me this if i didn't have to use it?

you have used it! :confused:
Question 2: what do they mean by the term "first order"? I never understand :(

it's like a diffraction grating … there are different angles at which there's constructive interference, and this is the first one

(basically, the difference in phase needs to be a multiple of 360° for constructive interference)
I don't understand their explanation though :(:(:(

Particularly this part: "Since nair < nair < nwater, light reflected from both top and bottom surfaces of the oil film experiences phase reversal."

Question 3: What's phase reversal??
Question 4: And why is this considered "constructive interference"? :(

phase reversal is where the reflected ray is 180° out of phase with the incident ray

whether it happens depends on whether the refractive indexes are increasing or decreasing (you need to look this up, and study it!)

if there is phase reversal, you have to add 180° to the phase difference before you decide whether it's a multiple of 360° :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top