Given a mass, how much mass of this solid will dissolve in w

AI Thread Summary
To determine how much Fe(OH)3 will dissolve in water, the Ksp value of 2.8E-39 is used in the equation Ksp = [x][3x]^3, leading to the simplification 27x^4 = 2.8E-39. This results in a concentration of 1.009E-10 mol/L, which is then multiplied by the volume of water (3.84 L) to find the total moles dissolved. The final calculation yields a mass of 4.14E-8 grams, but this is noted as incorrect. It is emphasized that the mass from the Ksp calculation should be used instead of the original mass provided in the problem.
Revengeance
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If 0.025 g of Fe(OH)3 is added to 3.84 L of water, what mass will dissolve? Ksp is 2.8E-39.

Homework Equations


Ksp = [x][x]
n= m/M

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe in this question that the starting mass is deemed irrelevant (although now i am starting to believe that is required to do something)

So, Fe(OH)3 = Fe + 3OH, this means that our Ksp equation will be

(x)(3x)^3 = 2.8E-39
So we can simplify to 27x^4 = 2.8E-39, solve for x to get the concentration, which will yield 1.009E-10 mol/L.Now multiply by volume:
1.009E-10 mol/L * 3.84 L = 3.875E-10 mol * 106.8670 g/mol = 4.14E-8 grams. This is what i am getting and this incorrect. Can someone explain why, and also can someone explain if we have to use the starting mass somehow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about concentration of OH-.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
Borek said:
Think about concentration of OH-.
ok so with the mass of the Fe(OH)3 we are given we can find the moles of it and turn it into concentration, is this what you are referring to?
 
Revengeance said:
ok so with the mass of the Fe(OH)3 we are given we can find the moles of it and turn it into concentration, is this what you are referring to?

Yes, just remember to use the mass that you calculated from Ksp, not the original one given in the question.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top