Given acceleration graph, determine v vs. t and x vs. t graph?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting acceleration graphs to derive velocity and displacement graphs, starting with initial conditions of t=0, x=0, and v=0. Participants clarify the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and displacement, emphasizing the importance of using kinematic equations and measuring areas under the curve. There is confusion regarding the curvature of the graphs, particularly when velocity is negative, but it is clarified that displacement remains negative when velocity is negative. The conversation highlights the significance of accurately sketching the graphs based on calculated areas rather than guessing. Ultimately, understanding the equations and their implications leads to clearer graph representations.
timnswede
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The title, and assume that t=0, x=0 and v=0.

Homework Equations


Kinematic equations, and area of triangle and rectangle.

The Attempt at a Solution


2o5h9Bo.png

I see what I did wrong with the part that is circled "parabola", as it should be just a straight line, but I am lost as to what is wrong at the part that is circled "curved up". It's speeding up during that part so wouldn't it make sense that the slope is steepest at the top of that section?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Instead of guessing, why don't you divide up the time between 10 and 25 secs and on your velocity graph "count squares" for each increment in area as you step through time?

And where you have the velocity steady at 0 m/s for a number of seconds, what will be happening to your displacement over that interval?

There's no excuse for guessing when you can measure directly off the graphs! :cool:
 
I think I see what I did wrong, it should go all the way down -375, then a straight line, and then curved down again another 84.375 m right? This was using kinematic equations. So from 10 to 25 seconds it would be curved up, but instead of going towards the positive x it would keep going negative? And when velocity is 0 displacement doesn't change. This is a rough sketch of what it would look like.
pDhEI5E.png
 
timnswede said:
I think I see what I did wrong, it should go all the way down -375, then a straight line, and then curved down again another 84.375 m right? This was using kinematic equations. So from 10 to 25 seconds it would be curved up, but instead of going towards the positive x it would keep going negative? And when velocity is 0 displacement doesn't change. This is a rough sketch of what it would look like.
You are right that the displacement is negative all the time, as the velocity is negative.
But think of the equation for displacement, when the initial velocity is zero: x=a/2 t2. It is a parabola, upward open when a >0 and upside down when a<0. Check the curvatures.
 
  • Like
Likes timnswede
Ah OK, that makes sense. I think I was too caught up with velocity being negative. The way you said I should do it makes it much easier though, thank you.
 
Are you going to post another sketch?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top