Given Sound-Level B1 at A Distance D1, Find D2 at Sound Level B2

  • Thread starter Thread starter antiderivativ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
To reduce the sound level from 120 dB to 80 dB, the listener must move to a distance of approximately 4.45 m from the pneumatic chipper. The inverse square law indicates that sound intensity decreases with the square of the distance, but the logarithmic nature of the decibel scale complicates direct calculations. A 40 dB reduction corresponds to a sound intensity that is 10,000 times quieter, which must be factored into the calculations. The correct approach does not require adding the initial distance to the calculated distance, as D2 represents the total distance from the sound source. Ultimately, the calculations confirm that a significant increase in distance is necessary to achieve a comfortable sound level.
antiderivativ
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm here to check my work again. I hope you don't mind. I'm going to try to check as many as I can today. :)

The sound-level 2.0 m from a pneumatic chipper is 120 dB. Assuming it radiates uniformly in all directions, how far from it must you be in order for the level to drop 40 dB down to something more comfortable?
Given:
D1 = 2.0 m
B1 = 120 dB
D2 = x
B2 = 80 dB
Find x. I decided I could use the inverse square law. As the distance increases, the energy decreases in proportion to the distance squared.

\frac{B1}{B2} = \frac{D2^2}{D1^2}

\frac{120}{80} = \frac{x^2}{4}
x= sqrt((120*4)/80) = 2.4495 m.

In order to hear 40 dB less, I need to walk 2.4495 m from my current distance. The total distance I stand from the chipper is 2 +2.4495 = 4.4495 m. Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
B1/B2=D12/D22 only works if all four values are measured on a linear scale. Since the decibel scale is logarithmic, it doesn't work.

40 decibel is 4 bels, which corresponds to a factor of 10^4=10000. So the sound needs to be 10 000 times quieter. Now you can use that formula, but don't add your initial distance to D2. D2 is already the listener's distance from the sound source.
 
I'm sorry I don't understand how what you have told me allows me to use the inverse square law, so I will try it using the normal equations. However, thanks for pointing out that I do not have to add the D1 and D2. You say 104=10000 will allow me to use my inverse square law. I understand that you're saying that because 10 to the power of something relates to log. When you say 10log(something), it equals that something. However, I don't see how a conversion to bells in this manner helps. Thanks, though.

Using B = 10log(I/Io)

120dB = 10log(I/(1x10-12)
I = 1 W/m2

4-1.jpg
 
80 = 10 log(I/10-12) = 10-4 W/m2
120 = 10 log(I/10-12) = 1 W/m2

P = 4\pi*r2
P = 4\pi*22 = 50.27

r = \sqrt{\frac{P}{I*4*\pi}}
r = \sqrt{\frac{50.27}{I*4*\pi}} = 200 m
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top