Global Temperature Rising: Troposphere & Water Vapor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
AI Thread Summary
Rising global temperatures are expected to increase water vapor in the troposphere, but the relationship is complex. Enhanced greenhouse effects may lead to more infrared radiation being trapped in the lower atmosphere, potentially cooling the upper atmosphere and reducing water vapor. This cooling could result in more cloud formation, which may have a negative feedback effect by reflecting solar radiation and diminishing the greenhouse effect. Historical examples suggest that wet conditions can occur alongside glacier growth, indicating that increased moisture does not always correlate with warming. The dynamics of Hadley cells could further complicate climate patterns, leading to unpredictable shifts in climate zones.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
If global temperature(s) continues to rise, does that mean that the troposphere will contain more water vapor?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
The big debate about water vapor is this versus http://www.climate2003.com/blog/arking.htm

You can also see it in this quick and dirty way:
If the Earth heats up more due to the enhanced greenhouse forcing then this heating will be strongest in the lower atmosphere, where most greenhouse gas is and it's closest to the source, the infrared radiating heat.

Too bad for the global warmers that this heat is not showing in the radio sondes temperature registration that measure exactly that area of the atmosphere, but anyway.

So if more infra red radiation is captured directly in the lower atrmosphere, the higher part of the atmosphere receives less IR radiation that the greenhouse gasses can capture and heat the air with. The cooling is actually occurring but no-one knows exactly why. Cooler upper air means less water vapor in the air and more condensation - hence clouds. Furthermore a higher vertical temperature gradient in the atmosphere means unstable conditions, convection and even more clouds forming. More clouds is probably having a negative feedback effect, more incoming solar radiation is reflected and there is less solar energy to capture with the greenhouse gas effect. So water vapor may have a negative feedback although it is the strongest greenhouse gas.

Are there examples of that negative feedback?

Perhaps. Try the paleao glacial confusion thread. We see two very wet era's (the Bolling Allerod and the Preboreal) with simulatenous massive glacier growing. Hence not that much warming despite the very moist conditions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, another question. From global warming, climate belts could shift northward by about 100 km in altitude for each increase in degree of temp. Does this mean tropical areas will become cooler than they are now?
 
Last edited:
Anyone?

Thanks.
 
Interesting question. The heating of the Earth causes Hadley cells and those govern the climate zones.
http://www.newmediastudio.org/DataDiscovery/Hurr_ED_Center/Easterly_Waves/Trade_Winds/Trade_Winds.html

In the hypothetical case that increased greenhouse gas concentrations would greatly increase the warming due to absorption of reradiated IR energy, it could be argued that the downdraft areas, the arid climates would heat more than the updraft areas (the moist climates). That unbalance could destroy the circulation of the hadley cells and have very unpredictable impact on the global climate. It would be more complicated than a simple shift of climate belts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...

Similar threads

Back
Top