Globular cluster luminosity function

AI Thread Summary
Astronomers measure distances to stars and galaxies using various methods, with parallax being the most accurate for nearby objects. For distances up to a million parsecs, classical Cepheid variable stars are utilized due to their predictable luminosity. Beyond this range, Type 1a supernovae serve as distance indicators, though care is needed to differentiate between different types of supernovae. The Globular Cluster Luminosity Function (GCLF) offers a method based on the consistent luminosity of old globular clusters, but it is less accurate than other methods due to systematic errors. Accurate calibration of the GCLF's zero-point and shape is crucial for its effectiveness in determining cosmological distances.
John Titor
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
So I was interested in how astronomers measure the distances to other stars, galaxies, etc and I found this pdf about the subject http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1992PASP..104..599J&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
It seems to be a good source but I still don't understand exactly how it is done, and don't have a high level of math understanding yet. I'm mostly interested in the globular cluster luminosity function, and the steps taken to actually get a distance to another galaxy etc. I understand a little bit about it but there is quite a bit such as the math that I don't understand. Can anyone help and explain this to someone who doesn't know much about the subject? Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
John Titor said:
So I was interested in how astronomers measure the distances to other stars, galaxies, etc and I found this pdf about the subject http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1992PASP..104..599J&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf[/URL]
It seems to be a good source but I still don't understand exactly how it is done, and don't have a high level of math understanding yet. I'm mostly interested in the globular cluster luminosity function, and the steps taken to actually get a distance to another galaxy etc. I understand a little bit about it but there is quite a bit such as the math that I don't understand. Can anyone help and explain this to someone who doesn't know much about the subject? Thank you.[/QUOTE]
It is a good source, but a bit out-dated with regard to Type 1a SNe. There are several techniques used by astronomers to determine cosmological distances, some more accurate than others.

[INDENT]d = 1/p[/INDENT]

Where:
[INDENT]p = The angle between the sun and Earth's position in relationship to the star, measured in arcseconds
d = The distance in parsecs[/INDENT]

Parallax is without a doubt the most accurate means of measuring cosmological distances, but measuring the parallax of objects further than ~1,000 light years is extremely difficult. The star is measured in relationship to the surrounding stars, and then six months later, when the Earth is as far from when the original measurements were taken as possible, the relationship to the surrounding stars is measured again. Parallax is measured in arcseconds

Out to approximately a million parsecs, classical Cepheid variable stars can be used to determine cosmological distances. All classical Cepheid variable stars have a direct correlation between their rate of pulsation and their absolute magnitude. Once the absolute magnitude is known, the distance can be calculated using the apparent magnitude.

[INDENT]d = 10[SUP]((m - M)+5) / 5[/SUP][/INDENT]

Where:
[INDENT]M = Bolometric absolute magnitude;
m = Bolometric apparent magnitude;
d = Distance in parsecs.[/INDENT]

At cosmological distances beyond one megaparsec Type 1a SNe can be used. However, care must be taken to ensure that it is not a Type 1ax SNe because they have a dimmer absolute magnitude, or a super-Chandrasekhar Type 1a SNe which have a brighter absolute magnitude. All Type 1a SNe have an absolute magnitude of -19.3.

See also:
[URL]http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v443/n7109/full/nature05103.html[/URL] - Nature 443, 308-311 (21 September 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature05103; Received 7 April 2006; Accepted 18 July 2006 [I](paid subscription)[/I] - [URL='http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0609616v1.pdf']arXiv Reprint[/URL]
[URL='http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/767/1/57/']Type 1ax Supernovae: A New Class of Stellar Explosion[/URL] - The Astrophysical Journal Volume 767 Number 1, 2013 March 25 [I](free issue)[/I]

Lastly, and the least accurate of all the methods used, is red shift. A spectrum of the object is taken and the amount of the object's light that has shifted into the infrared part of the spectrum indicates how far away the object must be.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the response though there wasn't much about GCLF it was helpful
 
John Titor said:
Thank you for the response though there wasn't much about GCLF it was helpful
The Globular Cluster Luminosity Function is based upon the premise that old (metal-poor) globular clusters exhibit a universal shape in luminosity that can be characterized by some number that can be used as a "standard candle." However, the systematic error inherent in the GCLF method makes it less accurate than measuring Surface Brightness Fluctuations, Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function, or classical Cepheid variable distance indicators. It has also been suggested that super-Chandrasekhar Type 1a SNe are more likely in globular clusters due to the integrated flux density of pulsars. The use of the GCLF to determine cosmological distances hinges on accurate and relevant calibration of the zero-point of the GCLF turnover and shape.

Sources:
Globular cluster luminosity function as distance indicator - Astrophysics & Space Science (September 2012), Volume 341, Issue 1, pp 195-206 (paid subscription) - arXiv free reprint
Dynamical friction in constant density cores: a failure of the Chandrasekhar formula - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2006) 373 (4): 1451-1460, published December 21, 2006 (free issue)
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top