I Glycol Fog Machine: Is Pipe Pipe Reconstitution Possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Braden T
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
AI Thread Summary
Pumping glycol fog through a 3/4" pipe risks reconstitution into liquid due to condensation, as fog consists of tiny droplets suspended in gas. Experts recommend using larger ducts (3"-6") to minimize this risk and maintain fog integrity. Smaller pipes may lead to significant condensation, potentially causing leaks or clogs, and reducing the amount of fog emitted. The flow dynamics change with pipe size, and while smaller pipes might still work, they are less efficient. For optimal results in a larger setup, using appropriately sized pipes is advisable.
Braden T
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to pump glycol fog through a 3/4" pipe without it reconstituting into liquid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would it become liquid ?
BTW fog is already liquid ... just an accumulation of tiny droplets in a gas.
The droplets are so small that the hole pretty much doesn't matter.
 
I have read on several fog machine websites that they recommend transferring the fog through a 3"-6" duct to keep the fog from recondensing into its liquid form again. I'm intending on pressurizing several hundred feet of 3/4" pipe with a glycol fog and have it coming out of several small outlets throughout the line.
 
Wait.
If you are talking about glycol vapor being pumped through the pipes, the bigger pipe will have an advantage.
The bigger the pipe, the less vapor would condense prematurely in the pipes before coming out.
Sadly, but I don't really have a clue how you would figure out mathematically how big of a difference it would make.
Having a pipe with a four or more times lower radius will significantly influence the flow and condensation in the pipe.
Sadly, I cannot really tell whether it would still work. My guess is yes, but you would have quite a bit of condensation in the pipes which could be a problem.
They might leak glycol or clog the flow or something.One thing is for certain: you wouldn't get as much fog out one side as you put in the other.
The people who write the websites you read through will have some experience with this, so if you are going to do it right maybe take the bigger pipes(they probably know what they are talking about).
30 meters of pipe doesn't sound like a little garage project :wink:
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top