Golf ball hit by club (conservation problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter XanziBar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Golf
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a golf ball and club collision. Key points include calculating the change in momentum of the ball, the speed of the club head after the collision, and the fractions of kinetic energy transferred and lost as thermal energy. Participants express confusion over the final kinetic energy being greater than the initial energy, suggesting possible errors in the problem's formulation. They conclude that the problem may be poorly conceived, as the final speed of the ball exceeds expected values for a typical elastic collision. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using precise calculations to avoid discrepancies in energy conservation.
XanziBar
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a typical tee shot, a golf ball is hit by the 300 g head of a club moving at a speed of 40 m/s. The collision with the ball happens so fast that the collision can be treated as the collision of a 300 g mass with a stationary ball—the shaft of the club and the golfer can be ignored. The 46 g ball takes off with a speed of 70 m/s.
A) What is the change in momentum of the ball?
B)What is the speed of the club head immediately after the collision?
C) What fraction of the club’s kinetic energy is transferred to the ball?
D) What fraction of the club’s kinetic energy is “lost” to thermal energy?

Homework Equations


Pi=Pf
KE=.5*m*v^2
P=mV

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I did Pf-Pi=.046*70-0=3.22 Ns

For B I did conservation of momentum: .3*40=.3*v+.046*70

v=(.3*40-.046*70)/.3=29.3 m/s

For C the initial KE of the club is .5*.3*40^2=240 J
the final KE of the ball is 0.5*0.046*70*70=112.7 J

112.7/240=.47

for D

KEi=240 J from before and the final is

0.5*0.3*29.3*29.3 + 0.5*0.046*70*70=241.5 J

which is where I am stuck because I am confused why the initial energy is less than the final energy. Help?
[
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a round off error. The final speed of the club is 29.666... If you use this value, your final energy will be slightly less than the initial energy. It helps to solve the problem symbolically (if you can) and plug in at the very end. This way, problems like this will be avoided.
 
Yeah I went back and used exact values before. And when I do the calculation

v=(.3*40-.046*70)/.3=29.2666 m/s=(439/15) m/s

Also, if I plug in your value of 29.666 I get 244.7 J in the end.

So I'm still stuck.
 
XanziBar said:
Yeah I went back and used exact values before. And when I do the calculation

v=(.3*40-.046*70)/.3=29.2666 m/s=(439/15) m/s

Also, if I plug in your value of 29.666 I get 244.7 J in the end.

So I'm still stuck.
I did it in two different ways and I agree with you. The final kinetic energy is greater than the initial kinetic energy by about 1.2 J. Now what?

1. We are both wrong and we need a third opinion.
2. This is a poorly conceived problem.
3. The golfer cheated by attaching a firecracker on his club and added extra speed to the ball.

I vote for option 2. What do you think?
 
You're right I think it is option 2. So I did the problem again "assuming" a completely elastic collision with a stationary target and if energy is conserved then the MOST the golf ball can go is 69.36 m/s. So I think whoever wrote this problem meant for the final speed of the ball to be less than 70 m/s. I think an elastic collision is when you get the most speed out of the target right?

Thanks for your help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top