Good Human Anatomy and Physiology textbooks

AI Thread Summary
A discussion on recommended textbooks for Anatomy and Physiology (A&P) highlights the need for clarity on the desired level of study, whether introductory or advanced. For advanced courses, "Clinically Oriented Anatomy" is mentioned, while "Guyton and Hall's Medical Physiology" is noted for its depth but complexity, making it less suitable for beginners. "Berne and Levy's Physiology" is also recommended as a slightly easier alternative. For a more accessible introductory text, "Vander, Sherman and Luciano" is suggested, although it may lack depth for upper-level courses. The choice of textbook often depends on the specific focus of the course and the preferences of instructors, with each text having its strengths and weaknesses. The discussion emphasizes the importance of selecting a text that aligns with the reader's learning style and course requirements.
cronxeh
Gold Member
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
11
Can anyone recommend a good textbook on A&P? I've seen a few on amazon but it did not quite have a feel to it. Also the Schaum's outline of Human A&P 2nd edition is over 10 years old


This one https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805359095/?tag=pfamazon01-20 looks promising. Anyone have anything better?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What level are you looking for? Do you want something introductory, or more advanced, such as something intended for a graduate or medical level course? At a more advanced level, anatomy and physiology are usually taught as separate courses, but at an introductory level, you can find the combined anatomy and physiology texts.
 
I have Clinically Oriented Anatomy, I guess I only need Physiology textbook. Can you recommend anything good?
 
It'll depend a bit on what you're looking for and at what level.

An easy one to read to just gather quick facts is Ganong's text. A very comprehensive, in-depth text, but hard to read (not a beginner text at all) is Guyton and Hall's Medical Physiology. Berne and Levy's Physiology text is almost as comprehensive as Guyton's, but a bit easier to read. The Guyton and Hall and the Berne and Levy text have some different strengths, so you'll find people who prefer one or the other for their classes generally based on their own biases of which material they like to emphasize (my physiology course as an undergrad used Berne and Levy because our professor was a cardiovascular physiologist and that text has better cardiovascular chapters than Guyton's).

One that is not as good in terms of depth of material, but is easier to read at an introductory level (I've heard a lot more complaints about it when used for upper level courses though, that it's very inadequate) is Vander, Sherman and Luciano.

My thought is if you're looking for a reference text to just read a section here and there at your leisure, and don't need to get through it all in a short time, and have time to look up other texts in a library if it gets over your head, then the Guyton text is the best one. You might want to borrow the Vander text from a library for a quick review, but I wouldn't recommend spending the money to buy it as a reference.

Anyway, those are the major texts used in physiology courses. They each have some pros and cons and people choose different texts based on the level the course is being taught at, and will sometimes supplement material from other texts for some chapters. Unfortunately, none of them is going to make everyone happy in every subject, and that likely reflects the areas of expertise of the authors.
 
Thanks Moonie :biggrin:

The index on Guyton and Hall's Medical Physiology is 85 pages long :bugeye:

I think ill get that one :-p
 
i used the Kapit and Elson coloring book to learn anatomy. seriously.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
12K
Back
Top