Engineering Good Resources to learn Classical Thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
Cengel's textbook is widely recognized as a solid resource for thermodynamics in mechanical engineering courses. While it is the primary textbook used in class, some students feel it lacks comprehensive explanations at times. Alternatives suggested include "Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics" by Smith and Van Ness, which is also suitable for mechanical engineering students. LearnThermo.com is mentioned as a potential online resource created by an experienced educator, though opinions on online materials versus textbooks vary, with a preference for traditional textbooks noted. Other recommended texts include works by Reif, Mandl, and G. Carrington, which offer layered approaches to thermodynamics. When considering older editions of Cengel's book, students are advised to evaluate the content differences and ensure they still meet their learning needs, particularly for long-term use.
sdobradomacaco
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I'm currently taking thermodynamics in second year mechanical engineering. I read previous threads on here about good textbooks, and everyone seemed to agree that Cengel's book is really good. Its the book we use in class, but at times I don't think it explains everything as fully as it could. Does anyone know of any other good resources. What about learnthermo.com? Is made by someone who has taught engineering for over 18 years, but I want to be sure that it is good before committing to it. Suggestions and opinions would be great. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, sdobradomacaco!

You can never go wrong with Çengel's, it is a great textbook. However, if you feel like you need another textbook you can try Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics by Smith and Van Ness. Don't let the title deceive you, it is also suited for mechanical engineering majors.

I've never used LearnThermo, so I don't know if it's good, but I prefer a textbook over any online resource, any day. But that's just my opinion.
 
MexChemE said:
Welcome to PF, sdobradomacaco!

You can never go wrong with Çengel's, it is a great textbook. However, if you feel like you need another textbook you can try Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics by Smith and Van Ness. Don't let the title deceive you, it is also suited for mechanical engineering majors.

I've never used LearnThermo, so I don't know if it's good, but I prefer a textbook over any online resource, any day. But that's just my opinion.

Thanks a lot for the advice. I'll be sure to look into that book for finals!
 
  • Like
Likes MexChemE
What about Reif and Mandl?
 
  • Like
Likes Geofleur
Basic Thermodynamics, by G. Carrington is a wonderful book. It introduces classical thermodynamics via a layered approach, each layer increasing in complexity with the book culminating in Gibbsian thermodynamics.
 
My class is using the 8th edition by Moran, If I'm going to spend the money i want to get the best book to learn from for years to come. Would there be any issue with me skimping out and going with a cheaper, older, edition by cengel? If so which edition could I stand to buy?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top