Google Ranking System: How Does it Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Google Works
AI Thread Summary
Google's ranking system primarily relies on the concept of PageRank, which evaluates the importance of web pages based on the link structure of the internet. Each link from one page to another is treated as a vote of confidence, but the value of that vote is influenced by the importance of the linking page. This means that links from high-quality, authoritative sites carry more weight. Google combines PageRank with advanced text-matching techniques to ensure that search results are not only from important pages but also relevant to user queries. The discussion also touches on the perceived discrepancies in PageRank ratings among different sites, highlighting frustrations about how some less valuable sites may rank higher than more meaningful ones. Overall, the conversation reflects on the complexities and sometimes arbitrary nature of Google's ranking system.
Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
68
I believe one part of google's ranking system includes how many people link to a certain page, and with what key words right?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
in simple terms, that's how Google works more or less.

From Google Technology
PageRank Explained

PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make other pages "important."

Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank, which Google remembers each time it conducts a search. Of course, important pages mean nothing to you if they don't match your query. So, Google combines PageRank with sophisticated text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant to your search. Google goes far beyond the number of times a term appears on a page and examines all aspects of the page's content (and the content of the pages linking to it) to determine if it's a good match for your query.

Wikipedia PageRank entry
 
Hmm... I remember seeing PF's pagerank by Google a while back, if I remember correctly I saw it at 4/10. Right now though, the main index is getting a rating of 2/10.

Then again, the site traffic (http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=physicsforums.com) for this site isn't nearly as large as some other websites, so that will probably explain why PF isn't as "important" as some other sites that Google ranks as being higher.

I find it strange that PF gets a lower pagerank status than http://www.something.com which is completely useless, but yet has a Google pagerank rating of 5/10.
 
here is how it works:

http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html

;-)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anttech said:
here is how it works:

http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html

;-)
Anttech, I may lose my job from my extremely loud laughing, then choking, coughing and spraying coffee everywhere!

You should have posted a warning! :wink:

This is the best explanation I've ever seen, although a bit too technical perhaps for some folks. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All I know is, after 1600 + posts at this PF, and plenty at the old PF, on subjects such as the meaning of life, abiogenesis theory, the nature of consciousness, etc., I was proud to tell my friends and relatives (including my 82 year old mom) to Google my name and see what came up.

Well, right after my best buddy Moonbear (seeking revenge for that running bear story) decided to designate me the author of a masturbation thread, that's what my friends and family discovered I am famous on the net for. :cry:

Google's method of deciding importance sucks (even though I love it and use it every day).
 
Last edited:
Les Sleeth said:
All I know is, after 1600 + posts at this PF, and plenty at the old PF, on subjects such as the meaning of life, abiogenesis theory, the nature of consciousness, etc., I was proud to tell my friend and relatives (including my mom) to Google my name and see what came up.

Well, right after my best buddy Moonbear (seeking revenge for that running bear story) decided to make me the author of a masturbation thread, that's what my friends and family discovered I am famous on the net for. :cry:
That's too funny! I mean, that's a terrible shame. :-p
 
Evo said:
That's too funny! I mean, that's a terrible shame. :-p

One of the cruel sisters twists the knife . . . Moonbear's accomplice.
 
Back
Top