Governing Equation for an electrical system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's Voltage and Current Laws to analyze an electrical system involving a capacitor and inductor. The user has derived equations for two nodes but is struggling to eliminate the dependence on V1. Suggestions include expressing the voltage across the capacitor and inductor in terms of their current and relating it to the current through the resistor. The conversation emphasizes simplifying the equations to find a solution for i2(t) in terms of i(t). This approach aims to streamline the analysis of the electrical circuit.
mintsnapple
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2h4984o.png


Homework Equations


Kirchoff's Voltage/Current Law

The Attempt at a Solution


I first started by summing up the currents at node 1, which is the intersection of 3 wires at the top, and node 2, which is between the capacitor and inductor.
So, at node 1: $$ \sum i = -i(t) + \frac{1}{R}V_1 + C\frac{d}{dt}(V_1 - V_2) = 0$$
At node 2: $$ \sum i = -C\frac{d}{dt}(V_2 - V_1) + \frac{1}{L}\int_{-\infty}^t V_2 dt = 0 $$
I also noted that $$ V_2 = V_L $$

So I have these two equations, but I am not sure how to easily get rid of the V_1 dependence. It's not as simple as just solving for V_1, is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Best not introduce more variables than is necessary. I think you'll find that your node 2 does not qualify for the exhaulted designation "node".

Express the voltage acoss the C + L combination in terms of their current, i2(t)

Express the voltage across R in terms of its current, i(t) - i2(t)

Equate the two expressions, and rearrange to give i2(t) in terms of i(t).

Good luck!
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top