GR & Time Dilation: Solve Satellite Orbit Problem

Lorna
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I am sorry for posting this problem again. I posted it in introductory physics and someone mensioned it might not be an introductory physics problem. Any way I still don't have an answer to it so thought of asking you all, thanks.

Homework Statement


A satellite is in circular orbit of radius r about the Earth (Radius R, mass M). Astandard clock C on the satellite is compared with an identical clock C0 at the south pole on Earth. Show that the ratio of the rate of the orbiting clock to that of the clock on Earth is approximately:

1+(GM/Rc^2)-(3GM/2rc^2).

Note that the orbiting clock is faster only if r > 3/2 R, ir if r-R>3184 km.


Homework Equations



--------------

The formula to find the rate is : 1+delta (potential)/c^2
so I have to find the diffrence between the potential


The Attempt at a Solution



potential on Earth = -GM/R
potential of object in orbit = -GM/r

diffrence = GM/R-GM/r

answer should be : GM/R-3GM/2r --- so my answer is wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lorna said:

Homework Statement


A satellite is in circular orbit of radius r about the Earth (Radius R, mass M). Astandard clock C on the satellite is compared with an identical clock C0 at the south pole on Earth. Show that the ratio of the rate of the orbiting clock to that of the clock on Earth is approximately:

1+(GM/Rc^2)-(3GM/2rc^2).

Note that the orbiting clock is faster only if r > 3/2 R, ir if r-R>3184 km.

I think I smell the rat. Don't forget that the satellite is also in motion relative to the Earth's surface. What is the orbital velocity at radius r? What is the time dilation effect for that velocity (as a linear approximation)? [I thought it seemed odd that the orbiting clock was faster only above a certain altitude... Note that the standard clock is at the South Pole: what is the linear speed of the clock there?]
 
Last edited:
orbital v = (GM/r)^1/2

so do we add 1/2 m v^2 + GmM/r = 3/2 G mM/r ~ 3/2 GM/r ? and then
delta (phi) = 3/2 G M/r - GM/R? If that's correct then I missed up with the signs.
 
You don't add the terms as such. Your calculation for the ratio of "time rates" at radius r is correct (to first order). This would give you the rate for a clock stationary with respect to the Earth's center (or the clock at the South Pole).

You would now multiply this rate by the Lorentz factor, gamma, for a clock moving at the orbital velocity with respect to Earth's center. What will that factor look like? If you use the binomial approximation, what is this factor approximately? You would then multiply this binomial with the binomial approximation you have for the "gravitational" effect (and only keep the "low order" terms).
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top