B GR vs quantum vacuum Lorentz invariance

mieral
Messages
203
Reaction score
5
is spacetime Lorentz invariant like the quantum vacuum?

They say the quantum vacuum is Lorentz invariant.. you can't locate it at any place.. but if spacetime manifold is also Lorentz invariant and you can't locate it at any place.. how come the Earth can curve the spacetime around the Earth and not some exoplanet light years away.

And if spacetime is not Lorentz invariant like vacuum, then what are the limited invariance it obeys and how do you make it Lorentz invariant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mieral said:
is spacetime Lorentz invariant like the quantum vacuum?

Spacetime is locally Lorentz invariant like the quantum vacuum, yes.

mieral said:
They say the quantum vacuum is Lorentz invariant.. you can't locate it at any place

That's not local Lorentz invariance, that's global translation invariance. Whether global translation invariance holds depends on the spacetime geometry; it's not an intrinsic property of the quantum vacuum.

mieral said:
how come the Earth can curve the spacetime around the Earth and not some exoplanet light years away

Because the spacetime geometry due to the Earth is not globally translation invariant; it looks different at different places.
 
PeterDonis said:
Spacetime is locally Lorentz invariant like the quantum vacuum, yes.
That's not local Lorentz invariance, that's global translation invariance. Whether global translation invariance holds depends on the spacetime geometry; it's not an intrinsic property of the quantum vacuum.

a) What kind of spacetime geometry has global translation invariance?

b) Is the quantum vacuum inside spacetime? Or is spacetime inside the quantum vacuum?

c) One has global translation invariance.. the other hasn't. Shouldn't it be consistent they should have a symmetry much like electric/magnetic field, space/time, etc.?

d) Is there a transformation that can transform spacetime to quantum vacuum and quantum vacuum into spacetime.. is this one of the goals of quantum gravity?

Because the spacetime geometry due to the Earth is not globally translation invariant; it looks different at different places.
 
mieral said:
What kind of spacetime geometry has global translation invariance?

Minkowski spacetime is the simplest example. If we limit it to space translations, any homogeneous spacetime, i.e., all of the FRW spacetimes used in cosmology.

mieral said:
Is the quantum vacuum inside spacetime? Or is spacetime inside the quantum vacuum?

Mu. (The question is not well posed so it doesn't have a well-defined answer.)

mieral said:
One has global translation invariance.. the other hasn't.

Where are you getting that from?

mieral said:
Is there a transformation that can transform spacetime to quantum vacuum and quantum vacuum into spacetime

I don't understand what such a thing would mean.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top