Gr11 Percentage of Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
To determine the percentage of kinetic energy (KE) and gravitational potential energy (PE) before and after Jake slides down the slide, the total mechanical energy must first be calculated as the sum of initial KE and PE. The initial KE is not zero due to Jake's initial velocity, which must be factored into the total energy calculation. The question specifically seeks to understand how much of the gravitational energy is converted into kinetic energy and what percentage remains as potential energy. The absence of friction simplifies the analysis, focusing solely on energy conversion. Understanding these energy percentages is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Du312
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The numbers aren't important whereas I just need an approach.
So the question goes like this, Jake slid down a slide at a velocity of X m/s (initial velocity), the slide is Y m tall.

a) how much (%) kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy are there before and after Jake slid down the slide?
b) what feature of the slide caused it to be in this way?

ps. it's not Eg = 100% and Ek = 0% before Jake slid down

thx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite understand the question. First, is there friction? Second, if Jake is sliding down, shouldn't gravitational energy be converted to kinetic instead of the other way round?
 
there is no friction, and yes gravitational energy is converted to kinetic, but the question's asking how much (what percentage) of gravitational energy is NOT converted... it is kinda confusing but it is how the teacher worded it O.o

actually, we can ignore it. I'm actually more curious about how you would calculate the the percentage of gravitational and kinetic energy in the first place (obviously it's not simply Eg = 100% and Ek = 0% before Jake slid down)

thank you for your reply and i'll revise the question a bit
 
Jake had x m/s initial velocity , so the initial KE was not zero

The total energy at the beginning E= KE(i) +PE(i).

The problem asks the percentage of both the KE and PE with respect to the total mechanical energy. ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top