Programs Graduate Advice for Achieving a First in UK Physics Degree

AI Thread Summary
Starting an undergraduate physics degree can be an exciting journey, with many students aiming for top honors. Graduates emphasize the importance of understanding the workload, recommending approximately three hours of study for every hour of class, though this can vary by course. They suggest balancing study time, taking thorough notes, and actively engaging in class discussions. Resources like Hyperphysics provide valuable overviews, while many universities offer online class notes and materials. Joining professional societies can also enhance learning and networking opportunities. Graduates advise focusing on excelling in the first two years, as they are generally less challenging than the final year, and recommend seeking out additional resources such as books and websites to support academic success.
epsilon
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
I started my undergraduate physics degree in September, and having been enjoying it a lot so far. As I'm sure any student does - I am aiming for a First.

I was wondering if any graduates would be able to help me out by answering a few questions for me on their experience:

Are there any things that you wish you knew when you were first-year?
How did you find each year? Modules, exams, etc.
What would you say is the best route to help with getting a first?
Any other recommendations? Books, websites, etc.

I read the "So You Want To Be A Physicist" thread on here which was very beneficial, in particular about trying to do excellently in the first two years as these are going to be a lot easier than the third year (which somehow I hadn't quite thought about).
Please go into as much detail as you can, and feel free to go beyond the questions that I have asked.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
epsilon said:
Are there any things that you wish you knew when you were first-year?
How did you find each year? Modules, exams, etc.
What would you say is the best route to help with getting a first?
Any other recommendations? Books, websites, etc.
Some of senior folks went though school before the internet, and probably most of us wish we could have known then what we know now.

My first year was interesting, but manageable. I did a hybrid program that involved nuclear and space (astro) physics, before I migrated to nuclear engineering. Most common recommendation was about 3 hours of study for each hour of class. Some courses didn't require that level of effort, and some required more. Try to balance the studying, take good notes, ask questions, and prepare for class and recitation.

Many universities now have pretty good websites, and many faculty publish their class notes on-line.

Hyperphysics (US) is a good site for an overview of physics. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html

Most professional societies have memberships for students. I'm not sure what the practice is in the UK, but perhaps one can inquire through the physics department, or contact the Royal Society - https://royalsociety.org/education/students-advice/

There is also the European Physical Society
http://www.eps.org/?page=membership_im
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top