Graphing the derivative of a graph

AI Thread Summary
To graph the derivative of a given function, it's essential to understand the relationship between the original function and its derivative. When the original function f(x) is increasing, the derivative f'(x) will be positive, and when f(x) is decreasing, f'(x) will be negative. Additionally, the concavity of f(x) affects the derivative: if f(x) is concave up, f"(x) is positive, and if concave down, f"(x) is negative. It's important to note that zeros in f(x) do not typically correspond to zeros in f'(x). Understanding these principles will aid in accurately graphing the derivative.
ACLerok
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
one of my calc assignments asks me to graph the derivative of a graph which can be seen here: http://www.eden.rutgers.edu/~cjjacob/images/fifth.jpg

i already know that when there's a cusp on the graph, the derivative of that point is at zero and that slope determines how the derivative acts. can anyone enlightnem me and give me tips on how to graph this one's derivative? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, here are some tips:

1. When f(x) is increasing, f'(x)>0. When f(x) is decreasing, f'(x)<0.

2. When f(x) is concave up, f"(x)>0. When f(x) is concave down, f"(x)<0.

3. Zeros in f(x) do not generally correspond to zeros in f'(x). (You'd be surprised at how many students goof that one up).
 
Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top