Graphing Trigonometric Functions Question

DLxX
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Ok I can graph sin(x) , cos(x) , and tan(x) pretty easily, but I'm having a hard time graphing the csc, sec, and cot ones. For the first three I just found the values of pi/2 pi 3pi/2 and 2pi. So for example pi/2 for sin(x) would be sin 90 or sin pi/2 which is equal to 1. I then just put a dot at 1 and did the same thing for the rest of the angles in radian measure and then just draw a smooth curve through them, but how do I do this with csc, sec, and cot?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider what happens to csc(\Theta) When Sin(\Theta)=0 .
 
In other words, you can't draw "smooth" graphs for sec(x) and csc(x) (or for that matter tan(x) and cot(x)). They aren't "smooth"- they aren't even continuous.
 
You should have seen that when u graphed "tan".You said u graphed it,so u have noticed that is "blows up" in certain points (namely where the cosine is zero).It's discontinuous as well.


Daniel.
 
\tan{x}, 'breaks up' at \frac{\pi}{2}(2k-1), and \cot{x}, 'breaks up' at k\pi.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top