Gravitation and Newton's Synthesis

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the distance from the Earth at which a spacecraft experiences zero net gravitational force due to the Earth and the Moon. This problem falls under the subject area of gravitation and involves concepts from Newton's laws and gravitational equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Newton's second law and the gravitational force equations. There are attempts to simplify the equations and check for algebraic accuracy. Some participants question the handling of terms in the equations and suggest focusing on symbolic manipulation before substituting numerical values.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on algebraic manipulation and the use of the quadratic formula. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in previous steps, and some participants are exploring alternative methods to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of keeping numerical values out of the algebraic steps until the final solution is reached to avoid confusion. There is also mention of the relationship between the distances from the Earth and Moon, which could simplify the problem-solving process.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



13) (II) At what distance from the Earth will a spacecraft on the way to the Moon experience zero net force due to these two bodies becasue the Earth and Moon pull with equal and opposite forces?

Homework Equations



NET F = ma
G = 6.67 E-11 (Nm^2)/kg^2
Fg = (GmM)/r^2
Mass Moon = 7.35 E 22 kg
Mass Earth = 5.98 E 24 Kg
r Earth to Moon = 384,403,000 m

The Attempt at a Solution



Apply Newton's s second law in the radial direction

NET F = m_craft( a_radial) = Fg moon = Fg Earth = 0
= (G m_craft m_moon)/(384,403,000 m - r)^2 = (G m_craft m_Earth)/r^2

m_craft cancels
G cancels

m_moon/(384,403,000 m - r)^2 = m_Earth/r^2
simplify

m_moon/((384,403,000 m)^2- r^2) = m_Earth/r^2

raise both sides to negative one power

((384,403,000 m)^2- r^2)/m_moon = r^2/m_Earth

multiply both sides by m_Earth

m_Earth( (384,403,000 m)^2 - r^2 )/m_moon = r^2

simplify

( m_Earth(384,403,000 m)^2 - m_Earth(r^2) )/m_moon = r^2

simplify

( m_Earth(384,403,00 m)^2 - 2(m_Earth)(384,403,000 m)m_Earth(r^2) - m_Earth(r^2) )/m_moon = r^2

simplify further

( m_Earth(384,403,00 m)^2 - 2(m_Earth)^2(384,403,000 m)(r^2) - m_Earth(r^2) )/m_moon = r^2

multiply both sides by 1/m_Earth and m_moon to clean up

(384,403,00 m)^2 - 2(m_Earth)(384,403,000 m)(r^2) - (r^2) = (m_moon (r^2))/m_Earth
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to use the quadratic equation?
 
yes i do
 
GreenPrint said:
m_moon/(384,403,000 m - r)^2 = m_Earth/r^2
simplify

m_moon/((384,403,000 m)^2- r^2) = m_Earth/r^2

NO.

Recall that: (a - b)2 ≠ (a2 - b2)

By definition:

(a - b)2 = (a - b)(a - b)

= aa - ab - ba + bb

= a2 - 2ab + b2

Another tip:

Don't bother plugging in numbers and carrying them through all of those intermediate steps. It just clutters things up! Work through the entire problem algebraically (i.e. in symbols) until the end, when you have solved for an expression for r, the distance where the forces are equal. The nice thing is that this expression will be general. It will give the distance between any two masses m1 and m2 (with a given separation R) at which the gravitational forces cancel. Then you can plug in specific numbers for the case of Earth and its moon.
 
Good, because that is what I think will finish the problem: but before going there check your work basically you have A*(k-r)^2=B*r^2 Seems you might have dropped some terms: the left side would be A(k^2-2akr+r^2).

Edit: just as Cepheid points out, and the tip should be taken to heart: keep the numbers out of it until the end--lots of wasted writing, and makes it MUCH harder to follow.
 
Ok I'm here what do I do now

0 = (m_M r^2)/m_E + r^2 + 2(3.84403 E 8 m)r - (3.84403 E8 m)^2

sorry about that
 
There that should be correct sorry
 
I was wrong

0 = (m_M r^2)/m_E - r^2 + 2(3.84403 E 8 m)r - (3.84403 E8 m)^2

i believe this is correct
 
Assuming you have done the math right, which I'll check in a minute--

you have r^2(m/M-1) + 2d*r - c^2. Use the quad, and see if your answer makes sense--you can check the work yourself by plugging in the distance in your original formula--forces should balance.

That looks better, I thought you had flipped a sign, remember it is so much easier keeping the numbers out of it!
 
  • #10
I think I did it right
 
  • #11
excellent--again your answer can be put back in the original eqn as a check. Really do give some effort at keeping the numbers out of it until you're ready to use your calculator. Errors are so much easier to spot and your prof will be appreciative as well!
 
  • #12
were do i go from here
 
  • #13
GreenPrint said:
were do i go from here

To the next problem, right? I'm assuming you used the quadratic formula to solve for r.

Recall (-b +/- sqrt(b^2-4ac))/2a Now the real fun begins.
 
  • #14
I don't know which one is a, b or c here becasue there are four terms...
 
  • #15
please! I'm almost done
 
  • #16
Collect the terms around r^2 This is a. The term in front of r is b and the pure number is c.
 
  • #17
and how do I do that

0 = (m_M r^2)/m_E - r^2 + 2(3.84403 E 8 m)r - (3.84403 E8 m)^2

there are two terms around r^-2

m_M r^2/m_E and
- r^2
all contain an r
how do i just simply collect this
 
  • #18
Notice what i did way back when -- I reposted your work as r^2(m/M-1) where m is the little mass, and M is the big mass. The quantity (m/M-1) is A. BTW that's ((m/M) - 1)
 
  • #19
how did you go from this

0 = (m_M r^2)/m_E - r^2 + 2(3.84403 E 8 m)r - (3.84403 E8 m)^2

to this

((m/M) - 1)

for the first term and getting rid of the second by combining it with the first to get

((m/M) - 1)


i don't see were that comes from

thanks
 
  • #20
(m_M r^2)/m_E - r^2
=r^2 (m_M/m_E-1)
 
  • #21
oh wow i feel dum...

thanks
 
  • #22
but why is this a true statement?

(m_M r^2)/m_E - r^2
=r^2 (m_M/m_E-1)
 
  • #23
I just moved the r^2 in front and represented the two terms as a product of the common factor r^2 and m/M and -1

Multiply r^2(m/M-1) you will be doing exactly the oppsite of what i did.
 
  • #24
oh gee I feel stupid :O
 
  • #25
Oh don't feel bad, i personally think your notation while elegant is just getting in your way. And maybe the algebra is rusty.

I like to keep it simple. I do have a suggestion--quadratics like this are real easy to bung up unless you have a programmable calculator. If you don't i found this applet:

http://mste.illinois.edu/users/exner/ncsa/quad/

That way you won't be wasting hours potentially. Just evaluate A. B, C and plug em in.
 
  • #26
Now that I've actually read the question, there's an easier (MUCH easier) way of doing it. Assume that the spacecraft is at d1 from Earth and d2 from the Moon. Then you can figure out d1/d2 by doing GMe/d1^2 = GMm/d2^2. Since you now know the values of d1/d2 and d1+d2, solving for d1 and d2 is easy.
 
  • #27
Nice job as essentially (d1/d2)=sqrt(m/M) so solving simultaneously gives rise to

d1+d1/sqrt(m/M)=total distance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K