Gravitation, really hard at least for me

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puchinita5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Hard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational force between a particle and a uniform rod using integration. The user correctly identifies the density of the rod and sets up the integral for gravitational force, but initially arrives at an incorrect answer. A key point raised is the importance of clearly defining the limits of integration, which can affect the final result. A common mistake noted is the failure to convert units from centimeters to meters, leading to a significant error in the final answer. The user ultimately learns from the experience and emphasizes the importance of careful calculations in physics problems.
Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Fig. 13-41, a particle of mass m1 = 0.23 kg is a distance d = 84 cm from one end of a uniform rod with length L = 6.4 m and mass M = 2.4 kg. What is the magnitude of the gravitational force on the particle from the rod?

Homework Equations


http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c13/fig13_41.gif

The Attempt at a Solution


ok...so i figured that the desnity of the rod, M/L should be the same for dm/dr...so then dm=(M/L)dx. (i thought just to visualize easier i made dr into dx, so it looked like a coordinate system to me)

then i figured i had to integrate F=int (dF)

so i did F= int (Gmdm)/(x+d)^2...since dm=(M/L)dx this made the integral
int (GmMdx)/L(x+d)^2

further simplifying i got F= (GmM/L) integral dx(x+d)^2

after integration i got F= GmM/L multiplied by -(x+d)^-1 from 0 to L...

then i solved, etc. but got the wrong answer...any idea if this is totally off or if i made a silly mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct...
 
It looks correct to me, too. However, I would just make a comment on your integral: you should be more explicit about the limits. E.g. I did a change of variables that changed my limits to d and L+d (but anyway I got the same result as you).

Maybe you just forgot to convert cm to m?
 
i'm an idiot... the answer was about 6.05e-12, and when i plugged it into the website i left out the e-12...what a silly mistake! well, i have looked at it sooo many times at least that i will never forget how to do this problem...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top