Gravitational Acceleration at Different Latitudes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how Earth's rotation affects gravitational acceleration at different latitudes, specifically comparing weight at the Equator and the North Pole. A man weighing 709.7 N at the Equator would weigh slightly less at the North Pole due to centrifugal force from Earth's rotation. Calculations indicate that the gravitational acceleration would be reduced by approximately 0.034 m/s² at the North Pole. The conversation includes corrections on terminology and units used in the calculations. Overall, the effects of Earth's shape and rotation on weight are emphasized.
duggielanger
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The rotation of the Earth affects the apparent gravitational acceleration at
different latitudes. At a location on the Equator, a man’s weight is registered
as 709.7 N on a set of very accurate scales. Assuming a perfectly spherical
Earth, determine what the same set of scales would register for the same
man’s weight at the North Pole



Homework Equations


Not sure I have used f=ma and w=mg but don't think I need these as the Earth is perfectly spherical
So it might be a=v^2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


As far as I can figure if Earth is perfectly spherical then there will be no change in weight due to the force of gravity. But maybe because of the rotation and Centrifugal force this might have a slight effect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


duggielanger said:

Homework Statement


The rotation of the Earth affects the apparent gravitational acceleration at
different latitudes. At a location on the Equator, a man’s weight is registered
as 709.7 N on a set of very accurate scales. Assuming a perfectly spherical
Earth, determine what the same set of scales would register for the same
man’s weight at the North Pole



Homework Equations


Not sure I have used f=ma and w=mg but don't think I need these as the Earth is perfectly spherical
So it might be a=v^2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


As far as I can figure if Earth is perfectly spherical then there will be no change in weight due to the force of gravity. But maybe because of the rotation and Centrifugal force this might have a slight effect.
Correct.
So, how much effect ?
 


So if I find the angular velocity first ω=2∏rad/T and then v=rω^2
Plugged in values
2*3.14/(24h*3600s/h)=7.3x10^-5 rads
v=6.378x10^6m/(7.3x10^-5)^2rads=0.034m/s^2
So the force of gravity will be 0.034m/s^2 less
and then I can find the weight .
Dose this seem right
 


duggielanger said:
So if I find the angular velocity first ω=2∏rad/T and then v=rω^2
Plugged in values
2*3.14/(24h*3600s/h)=7.3x10^-5 rads/s2
v=6.378x10^6m/(7.3x10^-5)^2rads/s2=0.034m/s^2
So the [STRIKE]force[/STRIKE] acceleration of gravity will be 0.034m/s^2 less
and then I can find the weight .
Does this seem right
Yes, except for some units and saying force rather than acceleration .

(Corrected above)
 


Ok thanks A lot SammyS your help is appreciated
 


And ... I forgot to say,

Welcome to PF !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top