Gravitational Acceleration near a Massive Black Hole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating gravitational acceleration near a massive black hole using the formula Rh = 2GMh/c^2. For a black hole with a mass of 1.61 × 10^14 solar masses, the gravitational acceleration at a distance of Ro = 1.001Rh is found to be 0.0945 m/s^2. Participants express confusion regarding the calculation of gravitational acceleration differences between the astronaut's head and feet, specifically how to relate the distances for part B. Clarifications indicate that Ro should be used for both calculations, with the second distance being Ro + 1.66 m. The final formula suggested involves calculating the difference in gravitational acceleration using the derived values.
mb85
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
The radius Rhand mass Mh of a black hole are related by Rh = 2GMh/c^2, where c is the speed of light. Assume that the gravitational acceleration agof an object at a distance Ro = 1.001Rh from the center of a black hole is given by Ag = G M / r^2 (it is, for large black holes). (a) What is ag at ro for a very large black hole whose mass is 1.61 × 10^14 times the solar mass of 1.99 × 10^30 kg? (b) If an astronaut with a height of 1.66 m is at ro with her feet toward this black hole, what is the difference in gravitational acceleration between her head and her feet?


Rh = 2(6.67x10^-11)(3.204x10^44)/ (3.0x10^8)^2
Rh = 4.75 x 10^17

So then, Ag = GM/ (1.001Rh)^2
Ag = (6.67x10-11)(3.204x10^44)/(1.001 x 4.75x10^17)^2
Ag = 0.0945 m/s^2

I find myself having trouble with part B. How do i relate them?

I did Ag = (6.67x10^-11)(3.204x10^44)/(1.66 x 4.75x10^17)^2
Ag = 0.0344 m/s^2
So i did the difference btwn answer A and B and got .0601 m/s^2

But i know its wrong. Can someone help me out? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part B,

calculate ag at ro and at (ro + 1.66 m).

This assumes the astronaut's feet are at ro.
 
So isn't Ro part A's answer?

and when you say Ro + 1.66, does that mean...
Ro =(1.001+1.66)Rh?
 
mb85 said:
So isn't Ro part A's answer?

and when you say Ro + 1.66, does that mean...
Ro =(1.001+1.66)Rh?
According to the problem, in part A, one is to calculate ag at ro.

In part B, find the between ag(ro) and ag(ro+1.66m).

It should be something like A * (1/ro2 - 1/(ro+1.66m)2), where A is some constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top