Gravitational attraction of bodies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a position-time equation for two massive bodies under gravitational attraction, specifically in the context of binary star systems. The derived equation, x(t)=√[4]{x_{o}^{4}-6Gt^{2}(m_{1}+m_{2})}, represents the distance between the objects but lacks a true frame of reference. The author seeks confirmation of this result and invites comments to enhance understanding. Clarifications are provided regarding the frame of reference, indicating that the equation applies to an observer initially at rest relative to the bodies. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of modeling gravitational interactions between massive objects.
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
Hello! The stem from this problem came to me when I was pondering how to describe the motion of two massive objects feeling the others' gravitational attraction (i.e binary star systems or something like that). Well this got ugly fast so I had to simplify a lot of things, and I finally got an answer for one.

Considering two massive bodies, initially at rest, with respective masses of m1 and m2, I derived a position-time equation of:

x(t)=\sqrt[4]{x_{o}^{4}-6Gt^{2}(m_{1}+m_{2})}

Some notes: This isn't a true position-time equation, because I couldn't figure out how to do it with respect to an outside reference frame (i.e x-y axis), so it is merely the distance between the objects. I can add work such as the solving of the differential equation if necessary.

Can anyone confirm this result? Perhaps add a comment or two that might help with the overall goal described above? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bump :cry:
 
Could you explain from whose frame reference your result applies ? For instance, your result might be correct for an observer situated in the line of sight between the bodies, and initially at rest wrt the bodies before they begin moving ( ie at t=0, nothing is moving ).
 
The answer is with respect to either of the moving masses, actually, if that makes any sense. Although, I assumed at t=0 nothing was moving with respect to the other.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top