Gravitational Collapse Calculations Problem Solved

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
I'm reading T. Padmanabhans General Relativity. In section 7.6, he describes the gravitational collapse of a sphere of pressureless dust(So ## T_{\mu \nu}=\rho u_{\mu} u_{\nu} ##). I should say his argument is the same as Landau's, but reading Landau's didn't help too.
At first, he assumes a line element of the form:
## ds^2=-d\tau^2+e^{\lambda(\tau,R)}dR^2+[r(\tau,R)]^2(d\theta ^2+\sin^2 \theta d\varphi^2)##
The rest of the calculations are shown in the following pictures.
Screenshot from 2015-04-22 22:57:18.png
Screenshot from 2015-04-22 22:58:13.png


My problem is with eq. 7.188,7.189 and 7.190. I can't understand why should we consider three cases for the function f. Because if this is only an arbitrary function we use in constructing the solution, then choosing one region would do the job and it makes no difference which region we choose. But then is it actually considering three regions for an arbitrary function? Or a physical interpretation is being attached to the function f and the three regions are somehow different parts of the collapse?
I'll appreciate any exlpanation.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shyan said:
if this is only an arbitrary function we use in constructing the solution, then choosing one region would do the job

No, it wouldn't, because you might not be covering all possible initial conditions. The three different possibilities for ##f## correspond to three different kinds of initial conditions: if I'm remembering correctly, ##f > 0##, ##f = 0##, and ##f < 0## correspond to collapses where the inward velocity of the dust a a given radius is greater than, equal to, or less than the "escape velocity" at that radius, which is ##\sqrt{2M / r}## ( ##M## is the total mass of the dust as measured from far away, which will be constant during the collapse). All three possibilities must be considered since they are all physically possible initial conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top