Gravitational field for 2 particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the gravitational field created by two identical particles positioned on the x-axis at +x0 and -x0, specifically for points along the y-axis. The gravitational field \vec{g} is expressed as a function of y, m, x0, and constants, with the participants attempting to resolve the gravitational forces into their components. It is noted that the symmetry of the problem suggests the x-components of the gravitational fields from both particles will cancel each other out, leaving only the y-component. Participants express confusion about resolving the forces without using angles, indicating a need for geometric insights. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the symmetry and components in gravitational field calculations.
Symstar
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two identical particles, each of mass m, are located on the x-axis at x = +x0 and x = -x0.

Determine a formula for the gravitational field due to these two particles for points on the y axis; that is, write \vec{g} as a function of y, m, x0, and so on.
Express your answers in terms of the variables y, m, x0, and appropriate constants. Answer in the form gx,gy.

Homework Equations


\vec{g}=\frac{\vec{F}}{m}
\vec{g}=\frac{GM}{r^2}\hat{r}


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm really at a loss as to how to approach this problem. I would assume that, graphically, the y-axis will be between the two particles and that we are trying to find the components of g in terms of the point on the y axis.

I suppose that in this frame we have a triangle with our particles on two corners and our point on the y-axis at the third corner.

I'm still very unsure as to how gravitational fields work in cases like this, but here's what I attempted:

\vec{g}=\frac{\vec{F_1}}{m} + \frac{\vec{F_2}}{m}
\vec{g}=\frac{mG}{r^2_1}\hat{r_1} + \frac{mG}{r^2_2}\hat{r_2}
r^2_1=-x^2_0+y^2
r^2_2=x^2_0+y^2
\vec{g}=\frac{mG}{-x^2_0+y^2}\hat{r_1} + \frac{mG}{x^2_0+y^2}\hat{r_2}

At this point, assuming I haven't made a mistake (I doubt that I haven't) I don't know what to do. Could someone give me a hand and some explaining, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track, kind of.

Correction:
r1^2= xo^2+y^2=r2^2

Then find the x and y components for each one of the two forces (or gravitational fields).
Add the components.
What can you say about the x component, just from the symmetry of the problem?
 
I'm really stuck on how to resolve the forces into x and y components without an angle. If we could use trig functions, it would be no problem, but the formula does not depend on theta, according to the answer. Is there some geometric trick I'm missing or what?

The x components (whatever they are) should just cancel to 0 right?
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top