Gravitational field of globular clusters ?

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational field at the center of a globular cluster typically lacks angular momentum and does not feature a distinct 'center of gravity' like other celestial structures. Calculating the center of mass is straightforward, serving as a useful reference point for simplifying equations of motion. Most globular clusters are spherical and exhibit a smooth density profile, without a prominent nucleus or spike in light intensity. Observations indicate that there is no supermassive black hole at the center of these clusters, as star motions suggest a lack of significant gravitational anomalies. Overall, the center of a globular cluster is characterized by a uniform distribution of stars rather than any extraordinary features.
billy_boy_999
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
what does the gravitational field at the center of a globular cluster look like? it doesn't look as though there is any angular momentum - is there a 'center' of gravity inside? a black hole?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The 'centre of gravity' or 'centre of mass' of any collection of objects (with mass!) can - in principle - be calculated with some simple math; it's just a point. However, it's a very convenient 'point'! Re-writing your (Newtonan) equations of motion using this point as the origin of your coordinate system makes the math easier to crunch.

Let's assume that your favourite globular cluster is spherical and has no net angular momentum (some globulars aren't like this; e.g. Omega Cen - the brightest as seen from Earth - is clearly somewhat elliptical). Then its 'centre' will be the centre of mass (assuming we define 'centre' appropriately). What lies at the centre of a globular cluster? In most cases, nothing special. Unlike elliptical (or spiral) galaxies, there is no obvious nucleus in globulars ... a curve of light intensity (for example) vs radius is smooth with no 'spike'. This means that the density of stars - say, per cubic light-year - increases smoothly to a maximum. Further, the motions of stars in the inner part of a globular suggest that there isn't a supermassive black hole lurking at the centre.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top