Gravitational Fields - is this the right way to solve it?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass and radius of a newly discovered planet based on its moon's orbital characteristics and surface gravity. The initial calculations for the planet's mass yielded 2.04 x 10^11 kg, using the gravitational formula but overlooked the importance of the distance in the gravitational equation. It was emphasized that the period of the moon's rotation must be factored in to accurately determine the planet's mass, assuming the planet's mass is significantly greater than that of the moon. The correct approach requires using both the gravitational force and the orbital mechanics to derive the planet's radius. Overall, the method needs adjustment to incorporate the correct application of gravitational principles.
fabbo
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I've completed this question and have an answer but I am unsure if my method is correct. The question reads:

A space exploration mission has discovered a new planet with a single moon. The distance between the centres of the planet and its moon is found to be 250000km and the period of rotation of the moon around the planet is 200 hours. On the surface of the planet one experiment shows that an object projected upwards at 20m/s just reaches a height of 14.7m. Taking G to be 6.67 x 10^-11Nm^2/Kg^2 calculate

a) the mass of the planet

I did:

mgh = 1/2 x m x v^2

so g x 14.7 = 1/2 x 20^2

g = 13.6N/kg

I know g = G x (m/r^2) so g is proportional to m

g = Gm so 13.6/6.67 x 10^-11 = m

m = 2.04 x 10^11kg

b) the radius of the planet

i was going to calculate this by T^2 being proportional to r^3.

T = m x r^3

200 x 60 x 60 = 2.04 x 10^11 x r^3

however this gave me an r for the moon as 0.0152m which can't be right...

Is this the right method or have I gone about it in the wrong way?

Any advice would be much appreciated

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry to be a pain but if there's anyone who can help with this question it would be great
 
fabbo said:
I know g = G x (m/r^2) so g is proportional to m

g = Gm so 13.6/6.67 x 10^-11 = m
How did you get from g = Gm/r^2 to g = Gm ?
 
fabbo said:
I've completed this question and have an answer but I am unsure if my method is correct. The question reads:

A space exploration mission has discovered a new planet with a single moon. The distance between the centres of the planet and its moon is found to be 250000km and the period of rotation of the moon around the planet is 200 hours. On the surface of the planet one experiment shows that an object projected upwards at 20m/s just reaches a height of 14.7m. Taking G to be 6.67 x 10^-11Nm^2/Kg^2 calculate

a) the mass of the planet


b) the radius of the planet
As Doc Al has pointed out, you cannot ignore the r^2 term.

You have to use the period of rotation of the moon around the planet to determine the mass of the planet (and assume that the mass of the planet is much larger than its moon so the orbit radius about the centre of mass is approximately the separation between their centres - otherwise it gets rather more difficult to solve).

Then use the mass of the planet and the acceleration at its surface to determine its surface radius.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top