Gravitational Force and weight at the equator

AI Thread Summary
A person weighing 600.0 N at the North Pole will weigh 597.9 N at the equator due to the Earth's rotation and the resulting centripetal force. The discussion highlights the importance of considering the normal force and the effects of uniform circular motion on weight. The gravitational force equation Fg = Gm1m2 / r^2 is referenced, but the key factor is the net force being influenced by the Earth's rotation. Understanding this concept is crucial for solving the problem accurately. The difference in weight is attributed to the upward push of the scale being affected by these dynamics.
MiniJo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the Earth is a perfect sphere with R=6370 km. If a person weighs exactly 600.0N at the north pole, how much will the person weigh at the equator? (Hint: the upward push of the scale on the person is what the scale will read and is what we are calling the weight in this case.)

Homework Equations



Fg = Gm1m2 / r^2
Fg = mg

The Attempt at a Solution



This was my belief: that since in the question the Earth is presumed to be a perfect sphere, it means the radius will be constant at all points of the surface. Therefore, shouldn't the weight stay the same? But the answer to the question is 597.9 N, not 600.0 N and I just don't understand how.

I have a feeling it might have something to do with the normal force, but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you supposed to take into account the rotation of the Earth around its north south pole axis?
 
I doubt that we have to take that into consideration. Our teacher never touched upon that yet.
 
MiniJo said:
I doubt that we have to take that into consideration. Our teacher never touched upon that yet.

I am sure that you must have to take into account the rotation of the Earth, otherwise the answer would be trivially the same weight. Have you covered uniform circular rotation, in which case the net force is F_c = \frac{m v^2}{ r} ?

Then just apply this and use the fact that the net force is equal to a normal force upward minus mg . Solve for the normal force.

Patrick
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top