How Does the Gravitational Force Equation Change with 1/r^3?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the gravitational force equation, emphasizing the transition from the conventional inverse-square law (F = Gm1m2/r^2) to a vector form that incorporates a 1/r^3 term. This adjustment arises when calculating the force vector between two mass points, where the distance r is defined as the Euclidean distance between their coordinates. The force vector is expressed as F = -G(m1m2/|p1 - p2|^3)(p1 - p2), which maintains the inverse-square relationship while normalizing the direction of the force. The additional r^3 factor is necessary for proper vector normalization. This approach, while unconventional, aligns with the principles of gravitational interaction in a vector context.
nearc
Gold Member
Messages
65
Reaction score
6
apologies if this has been covered elsewhere in the forums, but i was unable to find it. I've seen the usual gravitational force equation [i.e. F=gMm/r^2] with essentially r^3 in the bottom. an example of this can be seen in http://www.mathworks.com/moler/exm/chapters/orbits.pdf on pages 8 and 9.

i'm looking for any info [paper/webpages] that might explain how to use this approach, thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
it's a vector equation and the author (who happens to be the guy who created the first MATLAB) is not being conventional with his math symbols.

Newtons gravitational law can first be stated:

F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}

where F is the magnitude of the force vector that runs along the line that connects m_1 and m_2. and r is the Euclidian distance between them. this is a scaler equation and is the simple inverse-square gravitational equation you see most everywhere.

now suppose that the body with mass m_1 is located at point \vec{p_1} and the body with mass m_2 is located at point \vec{p_2}. the coordinates of the points are

\vec{p_1} = ( \ x_1, \ y_1, \ z_1 \ )

\vec{p_2} = ( \ x_2, \ y_2, \ z_2 \ )

the distance between the two points \vec{p_2} and \vec{p_1} is

r = | \vec{p_1} - \vec{p_2} | = \sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2 +(y_1-y_2)^2 +(z_1-z_2)^2 }

now, the difference vector that connects \vec{p_2} to \vec{p_1} is \vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}, so r is just the magnitude of that difference vector.

lastly to get a force vector \vec{F} that has magnitude F, we need to create a unit vector that runs along the line that connects \vec{p_2} to \vec{p_1}. that unit vector is the difference vector \vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2} normalized by dividing by its length r=|\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}|. this is where the extra power in r^3 comes from.

so the force acting on the body with mass m_1 located at point \vec{p_1} by the body with mass m_2 located at point \vec{p_2} is

\vec{F} = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \frac{\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}}{|\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}|}

or

\vec{F} = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{|\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2}|^3} (\vec{p_1}-\vec{p_2})

that is a vector equation, but it is still the inverse-square law. the extra power of r in the denominator is needed to normalize the vector connecting point \vec{p_2} to point \vec{p_1}
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top