Gravitational Forces acting on a satellite

AI Thread Summary
A 1000 kg weather satellite orbits the Earth at 500 km above the surface, experiencing a gravitational force of approximately 8445.5 N. The satellite completes an orbit in about 94.49 minutes, with a total orbital distance of approximately 4.32 x 10^7 meters. Its speed is calculated to be around 7617.1 m/sec. The discussion emphasizes the application of gravitational force and circular motion equations to solve the problem. Understanding centripetal acceleration is crucial for determining the satellite's velocity and orbital period.
Lyphta
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Gravitational Forces

Homework Statement


A 1000 kg weather satellite is orbiting the Earth at a constant speed. It is 500 km above the Earth's surface. The Earth has a mass of 5.976 x 10^24 kg and a radius of 6370 km. (a) How much gravitational force exists between the Earth and the satellite? (b) How long does it take the satellite to go around the Earth once? (c) How are is that (measured in meters)? (d) how fast is the satellite moving (in m/sec)?


Homework Equations


F=G(m1 m2)/r^2
C=2πr
v=rω

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) F=6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2)((1000kg)(5.976 x 10^24 kg)/6870000 m^2)
= 8445.5 N

(b) I have no idea how to do this one with the numbers that was given... the answer is 94.49 min...

(c) C=2(π)(6870000 m)
= 4.32 x 10^7m

(d) all I know is to do v=rω. But I don't know what to plug in... the answer is 7617.1 m/sec
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i know that stuff on the website. the only thing i don't understand is how to apply it to part b and d because I'm not sure of how to convert them into minutes. and without that, i can't figure out how to find the velocity...
 
I would do part d before doing part b, actually. Since you already know the force acting on the satellite, you can use Newton's second law F=ma. The acceleration a is centripetal accleration, the expression for which is given on the site provided by Kurdt.

Do you see what I mean?
 
oh yeah i got it! thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top