Gravitational mapping of the GROCE satellite project -- Strange Coincidences

  • Thread starter Thread starter dom_quixote
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational mapping of the GROCE satellite project, particularly focusing on the patterns and outlines formed by various geographical regions, including the Nordic countries and Australia. Participants explore the implications of these patterns in relation to geological structures and plate tectonics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the gravitational mapping shows outlines resembling the Nordic countries and parts of Russia, as well as Australia.
  • One participant questions the extent of the outlines and mentions the geological activity in Scandinavia and the Baltic region due to post-glacial land rise.
  • Another participant provides links to higher resolution maps and additional resources related to Earth's gravity and geological features.
  • A participant argues that the perceived patterns may not have a direct relationship and emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying geological structures related to plate tectonics and continental drift.
  • There is a reference to the historical context of the discovery of seafloor spreading and its implications for understanding continental movement.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the insights shared and acknowledges the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints regarding the interpretation of gravitational mapping and its relation to geological structures. There is no consensus on the significance of the observed patterns, and participants express differing opinions on their implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider underlying geological relationships and the historical context of geological discoveries, indicating that the discussion is nuanced and dependent on various interpretations of geological data.

dom_quixote
Messages
52
Reaction score
9
The gravitational mapping of the GROCE satellite projects to the left - at sea level - a rough outline formed by the Nordic countries, Finland and part of Russia.

010125230707-buraco-gravitacional-terra-2.jpg


The same goes for Australia.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
dom_quixote said:
... projects to the left - at sea level - a rough outline formed by the Nordic countries, Finland and part of Russia.
How far to the left?
Scandinavia and the Baltic are still rising after the melting of the icesheet from the last glaciation.
The red area is the mid-Atlantic ridge, where the ocean is spreading.

Do you have a link to the maps?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dom_quixote
It is your eye and your brain that naturally look for patterns, and will always find some. Unfortunately, there is no direct relationship between the areas you circle. The underlying structure causes the variation in gravity. That structure is connected to plate tectonics and continental drift. It would not surprise me if you go on to study geophysics.

There is a map here that shows the age of the Earth's crust. As you can see, the areas you circle are not actually related or connected. They do not map onto each other, they just look to you like they might. They may have been adjacent at one time, like puzzle pieces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafloor_spreading

The coasts of Africa and South America are matched in shape because the Atlantic Ocean has widened. That is shown by the ages of the crust.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-ocean_ridge#Morphology

The Earth has stretch marks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-o...en-Tharp_World_ocean_floor_map_by_Berann).jpg

When I was eight, I told my teacher that Africa and America used to be joined together. She told me not to be silly, they are too big to move. Three years later, the Atlantic seafloor spreading was discovered by recognising the symmetrical magnetic patterns either side of the mid-ocean ridge. Ten years after that, I was studying tectonics at university.

Keep looking for patterns, but look for the underlying relationships that will show how they might be related or connected.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, berkeman and dom_quixote
Baluncore said:
It is your eye and your brain that naturally look for patterns, and will always find some. Unfortunately, there is no direct relationship between the areas you circle. The underlying structure causes the variation in gravity. That structure is connected to plate tectonics and continental drift. It would not surprise me if you go on to study geophysics.

There is a map here that shows the age of the Earth's crust. As you can see, the areas you circle are not actually related or connected. They do not map onto each other, they just look to you like they might. They may have been adjacent at one time, like puzzle pieces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafloor_spreading

The coasts of Africa and South America are matched in shape because the Atlantic Ocean has widened. That is shown by the ages of the crust.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-ocean_ridge#Morphology

The Earth has stretch marks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-o...en-Tharp_World_ocean_floor_map_by_Berann).jpg

When I was eight, I told my teacher that Africa and America used to be joined together. She told me not to be silly, they are too big to move. Three years later, the Atlantic seafloor spreading was discovered by recognising the symmetrical magnetic patterns either side of the mid-ocean ridge. Ten years after that, I was studying tectonics at university.

Keep looking for patterns, but look for the underlying relationships that will show how they might be related or connected.
Fascinating!
Thanks for the lesson and the links.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K