Gravitational Potential Energy of the earth

AI Thread Summary
To determine how high above Earth's surface a mass must be for its gravitational potential energy to be 17% of its surface value, the equation PEg = (-GMm)/r is used. The user initially set r1 to 1 meter, leading to confusion as it did not yield a sensible height. Clarification was provided that the radius of Earth is significantly larger than 1 meter, which is crucial for accurate calculations. By correctly applying the Earth's radius, the user was able to arrive at the right answer. Understanding that gravitational potential energy approaches zero at infinity is also an important aspect of the problem.
kt102188
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How high above the surface of the Earth must a mass be located so its gravitational potential energy is only 17.00% of its value on the surface?


Homework Equations



PEg=(-GMm)/r, PElocal= mgy where y is height the object can fall

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried a couple of different things but all my variables cancel out.

(-GMm)/r1=0.17((-GMm)/r2

r1/0.17=r2 If I randomly set r1 to be 1 r2= 5.88235 but that doesn't make sense because if you raise an object by 5m it would have a greater PEg

Any suggestions on where to go?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi kt102188! Welcome to PF! :smile:
kt102188 said:
r1/0.17=r2 If I randomly set r1 to be 1 r2= 5.88235 but that doesn't make sense because if you raise an object by 5m it would have a greater PEg

But the radius of the Earth is a lot larger than 1m. :confused:

(and remember, the question assumes that the PE at ∞ is zero :wink:)
 
Thank you! I was totally thinking of this wrong. Actually using the radius of Earth got the right answer.
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Similar threads

Variation of escape velocity with equal surface gravity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Is potential energy defined only for internal conservative forces?
Replies
15
Views
1K
Gravitational Potential Energy questions near the surface of a planet
Replies
8
Views
2K
Gravitational potential energy
Replies
3
Views
1K
Potential Energy and raising a satellite from Earth into a Circular Orbit
Replies
5
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy with Gravitational Potential Energy
Replies
6
Views
2K
Gravitational potential energy traveling from earth to mars
Replies
7
Views
3K
Integral for work done leading to potential energy sign confusion
Replies
5
Views
2K
Change in Potential Energy levels of a body in Gravitational field.
Replies
9
Views
5K
Elliptical orbit/ determine speed & potential energy
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top