A Gravitomagnetism: Derivation, Theory & Insights - Bill

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Literature
Messages
10,901
Reaction score
3,782
I often post a derivation of Maxwell's equations from Coulomb's Law and SR:
http://cse.secs.oakland.edu/haskell/Special Relativity and Maxwells Equations.pdf

The author has also published book about it, I sort of on a whim purchased:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1516864743/?tag=pfamazon01-20

In it he also applied the same derivation to gravity, and not surprisingly ends up with the Gravitomagnetic equations. They are, unlike Maxwell's equations, not relativistically invariant, nor do they take into account gravity gravitates that Peter Donis wrote excellent insight articles about:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/does-gravity-gravitate/

It must fail because unlike electric charge mass 'charges' are not invariant as it forms part of the stress energy tensor.

My query is does anyone know any literature about the gravitomagnetic theory being some kind f limiting case of GR, like linearised gravity is?

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bhobba said:
They are, unlike Maxwell's equations, not relativistically invariant

Yes, that's because the source, unlike in the Maxwell case, is not a 4-vector, but a tensor.

bhobba said:
does anyone know any literature about the gravitomagnetic theory being some kind f limiting case of GR, like linearised gravity is?

Section 1.2 of this paper might be the sort of thing you are looking for:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0311030.pdf
 
bhobba said:
I often post a derivation of Maxwell's equations from Coulomb's Law and SR:
http://cse.secs.oakland.edu/haskell/Special Relativity and Maxwells Equations.pdf
Hmm... Haskell appears to use a Loedel-type diagram and analysis, which works for special cases... but is limited, compared to a Minkowski diagram and its methods.

On gravitomagnetism,
this ancient thread (my post and the rest of thread) might be of interest.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/there-is-no-gravitational-dipole.80710/#post-691492
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/gravitomagnetism-and-gr.54932/
 
It's not about gravitomagnetism, but as usual Feynman is a very good read to get an alternative view on fundamental physics:

R. P. Feynman, Feynman lectures on gravitation,
Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1996).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top