Gravity on the height of 12740 km ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Height
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating gravitational acceleration at a height of 12,740 km, which is mistakenly interpreted as 2 times the Earth's radius instead of 1. The user initially arrives at two different results: 4.905 m/s² and 2.4525 m/s², leading to confusion regarding the correct answer, which is stated to be 1.09 m/s² in the textbook. After further calculations and clarifications, the user confirms that 2.4525 m/s² is indeed the correct value. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting height in relation to Earth's radius when calculating gravity. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion with assistance from others in the thread.
Amar
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So the problem I have is calculating the gravity acceleration on the height of 12740km or 2 times the radial distance of Earth. The problem is relatively simple and I think that I have it right but the result doesn't match with the book.

## g_0=9,81 \frac {m}{s^2} ##
##R=6370km ##
## h=R=6370km ##

Homework Equations


## g = g_0 \frac{R^2}{(R+h)^2} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


Well given that I have everything except ## g ## I could have just put everything in and be done with it. I went with canceling out the symbols and got ## g = \frac {g_0}{2} ## This resulted in 4.905. When calculating everything the result was 2.4525. The result specified in the book is 1,09 m/s^2. I'm really confused :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A height is a distance above the Earth's surface. You're given a height of 2R, so the radial distance is 3R...
 
gneill said:
A height is a distance above the Earth's surface. You're given a height of 2R, so the radial distance is 3R...

I must have explained it badly. The height given is 1R

EDIT: The title is wrong, sorry..
 
Amar said:
I must have explained it badly. The height given is 1R
.
That would make the book's answer incorrect...
 
gneill said:
That would make the book's answer incorrect...

But what about the double answer I got ? One is 4.905 the other 2.4525 ? Kinda weird that the the other is 2x smaller than the first :P
 
Amar said:
But what about the double answer I got ? One is 4.905 the other 2.4525 ? Kinda weird that the the other is 2x smaller than the first :P
Can you show your algebraic steps for your attempt by cancellation?
 
Amar said:
But what about the double answer I got ? One is 4.905 the other 2.4525 ? Kinda weird that the the other is 2x smaller than the first :P
Never mind, after another try at the calculation I got that 2.4525 is correct, thanks for the help :)
 
Back
Top