How Do Orbital Dynamics Affect Satellites with Different Masses and Distances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Satellite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the orbital periods and gravitational forces acting on three satellites with different masses and distances from a planet. The user is initially unsure whether to consider the gravitational interactions between the satellites or only the gravitational force from the planet. They apply Kepler's third law to deduce that satellite s2, with the same orbital radius as s1, would have the same period of 250 minutes. For satellite s3, they calculate its period based on the increased radius, suggesting it would be 250 multiplied by 1.5 cubed. The forces acting on satellites s2 and s3 are also derived, indicating that s2 experiences a force of 20,000 N and s3 experiences a force adjusted for its distance.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three satellites orbit a planet of radius R. Satellites s1 and s3 have mass m. Satellite s2 has a mass of 2m. Satellites s1 & s2 have orbits 2R from the center of the planet. Satellite s3 has an orbit of 3R from the center of the planet. Satellite s1 orbits in 250 minutes and the force on s1 is 10,000 N

a)What are the periods of s2 and s3?
b)What are the forces on s2 and s3

Homework Equations


T= [(4pi)^2/GM]*r^3


The Attempt at a Solution



As I'm starting this problem, I'm wondering: Do I have to consider the forces between the satellites as well? And if I do, how will I know the distances between them? Or is the force on s1 only the force from the gravity of the planet? Can I get some suggestions on how to start this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this going to end up being an expression or a number?
 
Ok, I just had some thoughts, according to Kepler's third law it seems to me that satellite 2 would also have a period of 250 minutes. Then by reasoning, increasing the radius by a factor of 1.5 would increase the period by a factor of 1.5^3 so the period of s3 would be 250* (1.5)^3. Is this correct?
 
F= GMm/r^2 So Then likewise, the force on s2 would be 20,000N & s3 would be 10000/(1.5^2)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top