Green's function for Klein-Gordon equation in x-space

RedSonja
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to derive the x-space result for the Green's function for the Klein-Gordon equation, but my complex analysis skills seems to be insufficient. The result should be:


\begin{eqnarray}
G_F(x,x') = \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} \int d^4k\frac{e^{-ik\cdot(x-x')}}{k^2-\frac{m^2c^2}{\hbar^2}+i\epsilon}
= \left(-\frac{1}{4\pi} \delta (s^2) + \frac{mc^2}{8 \pi \hbar s} H_1^{(1)} \left(\frac{mc^2}{\hbar} s \right) \right) \:\Theta (s)
- \frac{m}{4\pi^2 s} K_1 \left(i\frac{mc^2}{\hbar} s \right) \:\Theta(-s))\\
\end{eqnarray}

with s^2 = c^2(t-t')^2-(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')^2, the source point x', \Theta(s) the Heaviside stepfunction, H_1^{(1)}(x) the Hankel function of the first kind, and K_1(x) the modified Bessel function of the second kind.

I changed to spherical polar coordinates and did the \phi and \theta integrals first. From there I've tried several approaches, but I always end up with a complex integral of a multivalued function:

\begin{equation}
\int \frac{f(z)}{\sqrt{z^2 \pm a^2}} dz
\end{equation}

From residues I get zero when f(z) is an exponential function, but that can't be right?

Both my quantum field theory and many-particle books work in k-space and I haven't found the derivation here.

Would someone be kind enough to guide me throught the correct procedure for the different steps of the Fourier transform of the Feynman propagator?

Thanks for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried greiner quantum electrodynamics.I think the x-space green function is derived there(but perhaps for spin 1/2 but that will lead you the way)
 
It ain't easy!

G(x,x') = (2π)-4∫eip·(x-x')/(p2 + m2-i0) d4p

Making use of the integral identity

0 e-i(ξ-i0)s ds ≡ -i/(ξ-i0)

we obtain

G(x,x') = i/(2π)40 ds ∫exp{-i[(p2+m2-i0)s - p·(x-x')]} d4p

Now complete the square in the exponent and use the Gaussian integral,

-∞ eiax2 dx ≡ √(π/a) exp{(i a/|a|)(π/4)}

G(x,x') = (4π)-20 s-2 exp{-i[m2s - (x-x')2/4s]}ds

From there, in a few more steps it reduces to Schlafli's integral representation of the Bessel function.
 
Last edited:
Cheers, Bill_K!
I just knew there had to be a neat trick for this!
 
There may be some useful comments amongst this fairly ancient thread

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=217846

(probably my own posts in it were too terse to be much help.) There were some references mentioned which might be more helpful. Bogoliubov & Shirkov definitely does it. There was also a little book by Feynman that had them in an appendix.
 
Thanks for calling attention to that! In fact, the 3rd Edition of "The BS Book" can be read online here.

Basically what they do is to reduce the Green's functions to a different integral representation of the Bessel functions, namely integrals of the form ∫-∞ eiz sinh t dt.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top