Green’s function of Dirac operator

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Green's function for the Dirac operator using equations from Peskin. The author combines the expressions for the Feynman propagator, \( S_F \), with the two-point correlation functions of the field operators. While the first and third terms simplify correctly, the second term vanishes due to the Klein-Gordon equation. The fourth term, however, does not simplify in the same manner, leading to complications in the overall calculation. This discrepancy highlights the challenges in applying the Klein-Gordon equation to all terms in the derivation.
Pouramat
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
My question comes from the textbook by Peskin & Schroeder,

If $$S_F(x-y)$$ is Green’s function of Dirac operator, how we should verify
$$ (i {\partial}_{\mu} \gamma^{\mu} -m)S_F (x-y)= i \delta^{(4)} (x-y) . $$
!!Didn’t know how to write slashed partial!!
all of $$\partial _x$$ in my solution are slashed but I did not know how to write it.
Relevant Equations
Using $$S_F(x-y)$$ definition:
\begin{align}
S_F(x-y) &= < 0|T \psi (x) \bar\psi (y) |0> \\
& = \theta(x^0-y^0) <0|\psi (x) \bar\psi (y) |0>- \theta(y^0-x^0) <0|\bar\psi (y) \psi (x) |0>
\end{align}
I started from eq(3.113) and (3.114) of Peskin and merge them with upper relation for $S_F$, as following:
\begin{align}
S_F(x-y) &=
\theta(x^0-y^0)(i \partial_x +m) D(x-y) -\theta(y^0-x^0)(i \partial_x -m) D(y-x) \\
&= \theta(x^0-y^0)(i \partial_x +m) < 0| \phi(x) \phi(y)|0 > -\theta(y^0-x^0)(i \partial_x -m) < 0| \phi(y) \phi(x)|0 >
\end{align}
Now we can calculate Green's Function of Dirac operator using this form of $S_F$
\begin{align}
(i \partial_x -m) S_F =& [(i \partial_x -m) \theta(x^0-y^0)][(i \partial_x +m) < 0| \phi(x) \phi(y)|0 >]\\
&+\theta(x^0-y^0)[(\partial^2-m^2) <0| \phi(x) \phi(y)|0>] \\
&-[(i \partial_x -m) \theta(y^0-x^0)][(i \partial_x-m) <0| \phi(y) \phi(x)|0 >] \\
&- \theta(y^0-x^0)[(i \partial_x -m)(i \partial_x -m)< 0| \phi(y) \phi(x)|0 >]
\end{align}

All of the terms are fine except the last line.The 1st and 3rd terms simplify as following The 2nd term is zero using klein-Gordon equation
The 1st term :
\begin{equation}
[(i \partial_x -m) \theta(x^0-y^0)][(i \partial_x +m) < 0| \phi(x) \phi(y)|0 >] = [-\partial_0 \theta(x^0-y^0)][<0| \pi(x) \phi(y)|0>]
\end{equation}
The 3nd term:
\begin{equation}
[(i \partial_x -m) \theta(y^0-x^0)][(i \partial_x +m) < 0| \phi(y) \phi(x)|0 >] = [-\partial_0 \theta(y^0-x^0)][< 0| \phi(x) \pi(y)|0 >]
\end{equation}
if the 4th term like the 2nd term was Klein-Gordon equation the problem gets solved, but it isn't.
 
Last edited:
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
967
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K