Griffiths dipole moment

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Griffiths dipole moment

Homework Statement


On page 244 of Griffiths E and M book, Griffiths defines the magnetic dipole moment as
\vec{m} = I \int d\vec{a}. Then in problem 5.58, he asks us to calculate the dipole moment of a uniformly charged spinning solid sphere. How is that compatible with the definition he gave?
It seems like Griffiths derived the formula for the magnetic dipole moment only using line currents not surface or volume currents and then asks us to find the magnetic dipole moments of volume and surface currents. I don't understand how to do that!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't G give the integral of rXj form for the mag moment?
 
What do you mean? All I see is <br /> \vec{m} = I \int d\vec{a} <br />

which is an integral but it does not work for volume or surface charges? So, I think that the answer is no he does not which is very annoying.
 
Griffiths has given the wxpression for the volume charge density J= rho*v

Integrate this to have I

Then calculate m
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top