Grounded conducting cylinder using Laplace

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates for a grounded conducting cylinder in a uniform external electric field. The user seeks guidance on finding the potential V(r) and the induced surface charge, while mentioning the need to apply separation of variables. It is noted that the z term can be ignored due to the problem's independence from that variable. Boundary conditions are emphasized, particularly that V(a) = 0 for the grounded cylinder. The conversation concludes with the importance of fixing integration constants to obtain a valid solution.
meteorologist1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble applying Laplace's equation solution in cylindrical coordinates to the problem of the grounded conducting cylinder of radius a in a uniform external field. The cylinder axis is the z axis, and the external electric field is E0 in the x direction. I need to find the potential V(r) and the induced surface charge. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did u do exactly,did u separate variables and got ODE-s for all three variables...?

Daniel.
 
My professor in class said to use separation of variables.

\Phi = \Phi(\rho, \phi, z)
\nabla^2\Phi = \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\partial}{\partial\rho} (\rho\frac{d\Phi}{d\rho}) + \frac{1}{\rho^2}\frac{\partial^2\Phi}{\partial\phi^2} + \frac{\partial^2\Phi}{\partial z^2}
which is the Laplace's Equation in cylindrical coordinates. And I think he said that we can ignore the z term because this case is z independent.

Then I'm not sure how to obtain the solutions to this equation. And after I get the solutions, how do I apply it to this problem?
 
Well,u have to come up with so-called limit conditions.The general solution will not be good for anything,if u can't use the limit conditions...

Daniel.
 
I think we call them boundary conditions. Well in this case, since the cylindrical conductor is grounded, the limit condition must be that V(a) = 0.
 
Okay,then,separate varaibles and integrate each equation.Though i think you may need another condition.You must fix 2 integraton constants,after all...

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top