Group theory question about the N large limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the context of AdS/CFT and large N limits, U(N) and SU(N) are not isomorphic, but their physical implications converge in this limit. The relevant physics is primarily encoded in SU(N), while U(N) introduces additional factors that relate to center of mass motion of branes. Key algebraic identities, such as the contraction of SU(N) matrices, simplify calculations in the large-N limit, leading to approximations for various operators and structure constants. For instance, the identity involving generators T illustrates how terms behave as N approaches infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically U(N) and SU(N) groups.
  • Familiarity with AdS/CFT correspondence and its implications in theoretical physics.
  • Knowledge of the large N limit and its significance in quantum field theories.
  • Basic grasp of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and mesonic operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the large N limit in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the algebraic identities related to SU(N) matrices and their applications.
  • Investigate the role of center of mass motion in U(N) gauge theories.
  • Learn about the 1/N expansion in QCD and its effects on mesonic operators.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, string theory, and anyone researching the implications of large N limits in gauge theories.

llorgos
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I keep hearing that in the large N limit (so I am talking in specific AdS/CFT but more general too I guess) U(N) and SU(N) are isomorphic. So if I construct, say, the ## \mathcal{N}=1 ## SYM Lagrangian in the large N limit, I can take as gauge group both of the ones mentioned above.

Why is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not, U(N) and SU(N) are never isomorphic. Maybe in the large N limit all the relevant physics is encoded in the SU(N) and any extra group factors from U(N) correspond to center of mass motion of the branes, but that concerns physics not group theory.
 
Many simplifications in the large-N limit are due to algebraic identities arising in contractions of su(N) matrices.

One example for fund-rep. generators T with adjoint-rep. index a=1..N2-1 is

##2\,T^a_{ij}\,T^a_{kl} = \delta_{il}\,\delta_{jk} - \frac{1}{N}\delta_{ij}\,\delta_{kl}##

and setting 1/N = 0 in the large-N limit. There are other identified for the anti-symm. structure constants f and the less well-known symm. structure constants d derived from this identity. In addition one can derive similar approximations for terms with three or more generators T.

Another approx. in 1+1 dim. QCD is valid for "mesonic" operators. If there are fields q carrying a fund-rep. index i you define

##Q(x,y) = \frac{1}{N}q_i(x)\,q_k(y)##

You may use a an approximation of Q in terms of the vev + mesonic fluctuations like

##Q(x,y) = \langle 0|Q(x-y)|0\rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\tilde{Q}(x,y) + \ldots##

which means that you have an 1/N expansion in terms of vev + free mesons + interaction terms.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K