Guass's Law for a charge distribution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Gauss's Law to determine the electric field of a long cylindrical charge distribution with uniform charge density. Participants explore the implications of using different radii (little r vs. big R) in calculations for the electric field both inside and outside the cylindrical distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about whether to use the total charge of the entire cylinder or just the charge within the Gaussian surface when calculating the electric field.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the electric field at a point depends only on the charges enclosed by the Gaussian surface, suggesting that external charges do not affect the field.
  • A different participant asserts that the Gaussian cylinder should be used to determine the electric field, implying that the charge inside the Gaussian surface is the relevant quantity.
  • One participant encourages confidence in the results obtained from calculations, suggesting that belief in the correctness of the results is important.
  • Another participant confirms that according to Gauss's Law, the charge considered should be that within the Gaussian surface, supporting the use of the radius 'r' in the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the charge considered should be that within the Gaussian surface, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of using different radii in the calculations and the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential confusion regarding the application of Gauss's Law and the geometric considerations involved in determining the electric field for a cylindrical charge distribution. There are unresolved aspects related to the interpretation of the radius used in calculations.

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
First, this is not a homework question, just something I've been confused about for some time. I understand how to use Gauss's law in many ways but one thing I have always stumbled with is whether the E-field of a charge distribution should involve little r or big R in such an example:

In finding the E-field of a long cylindrical charge distribution with radius R and a uniform charge density \rho. If I want to find the E-field inside (r<R) such a distribution shouldn't the final answer contain a big R?

Here is my work. Since we have cylindrical symmetry we can consider a guassian cylinder of radius r inside about the cylindrical axis. The total charge Q is given by Q=\rho V where V is the volume of the entire cylinder correct? (This is where I get confused) Or just the Guassian cylinder?

If the entire cylinder then the volume is V=\pi R^{2}L, where L is the length of the cylindrical volume. Then working out the rest of the problem we have:

\oint EdA=E(2\pi r)L = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_{0}} = \frac{\rho \pi R^{2}L}{\epsilon_{0}}
E = \frac{\rho R^2}{2 \epsilon_{0} r}

If the Guassian cylinder then the volume is V=\pi r^{2}L, then the E-field is just:

E = \frac{\rho r}{2 \epsilon_{0}}

Do you see my confusion? I need to understand this and I think it is just geometrical issue. . .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be aware of a very important aspect of Gauss's Law - that the field at any point r depends ONLY on the charges enclosed by the surface of size r (under highly symmetric situation). The charges outside the surface do not contribute to the E-field.

So in your example, you could have R = infinity if you wish, and you still have the same expression for the E-field, because it only cares about the amount of charges enclosed by your gaussian surface.

Zz.
 
It's the Gaussian cylinder. Otherwise, there is no point to making the Gaussian surface in the first place.
 
If you're confident you've done it right, you have to believe the results which you get!
 
Last edited:
According to the Gauss's Law, Q is the charge inside the gaussian surface. So, the 2nd answer involving 'r' is right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K