Half-Cell Potential: Understand What It Means & Why It Matters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Itskitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of half-cell potential, specifically regarding the Zn/Zn2+ electrode. The half-cell potential is defined as the potential difference between a metallic zinc electrode and the zinc ion solution during the reduction reaction Zn2+ + 2e- -> Zn(s). Clarification is provided that the "metal" refers to the electrode and the "solution" to the Zn2+ ions. Participants express confusion about why half cells with higher potential differences undergo reduction more readily, despite the expectation that positive charges would move from higher to lower potential. It is noted that higher potential indicates a better electron acceptor, as compared to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), which is the reference point for these potentials. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding redox reactions as a whole, emphasizing that both oxidation and reduction occur simultaneously in a cell. Participants are encouraged to clarify their questions and provide specific examples to facilitate better understanding.
Itskitty
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Half-cell potential?

According to an online chemistry website ( www.chem1.com)
If the half-cell potential for Zn/Zn+ electrode is defined as the potential difference between a piece of metallic zinc and the solution when the reaction Zn2+ + 2e- -> Zn (s) takes place.

That is E cell = V metal - V solution

What does this means?

Is the metal referring to the electrode and the solution referring to the Zn2+?

If it is so, then why do half cells with higher potential difference undergo reduction more readily than half cells with lower potential difference?

I mean the potential difference is supposed to be associated with positive charges, right?

So if one thing has higher potential, then positive charges would want to move to another thing with fewer amount of positive charges.

That, in reality, means that the e- would flow from Ag+ to Ag.

Which is not the usual case?

Could anyone help me with this?

I understand that in the activity series,
we're comparing the performance of each species to those of Hydrogen, so
the higher the potential, the better electron acceptor it will be.

But what about this potential thingy??

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


Yes, the solid is the electrode and the Zn2+ is the solution. The reaction you wrote out is a reduction half reaction, and so you would be looking at the reduction potential. This will be positive because the standard hydrogen cell is defined as the zero for these numbers. Basically it's only positive in relation to the SHE, but then again, I'm not exactly sure if this is what you were asking.

Also be careful with using the word charge. We're dealing with oxidation numbers here, not formal charge.
 


Thank you for your reply. :D

That's not my question tho
but i'll think abt it more and post some more questions
may be I'm confusing myself :(
 


Let's break this down; how familiar are you with redox reactions? Are you just starting to learn about them? It seems like you're not looking at the cell as a whole, which consists of an oxidation AND a reduction. The direction in which each half reaction proceeds is relative to the potential

Does your question come from a specific example? If so, it would probably help to post all the information you're looking at, and which parts you don't understand.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top