Half-Life Period: Solving Normal Radioactive Rate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Intelligent-E
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Half-life Period
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced in a laboratory setting regarding the management of radioactive materials and maintaining a normal radioactive rate to prevent criticality. Participants express a desire for clarity on specific concerns, as initial references to "this" and "it" lack context. The concept of half-life is explained as the time required for a substance undergoing decay to reduce by half, primarily associated with radioactive decay. There is a distinction made between exponential and non-exponential decay processes, with half-lives being a key characteristic of the former. The conversation emphasizes the need for practical solutions rather than theoretical information, highlighting the urgency of the situation.
Intelligent-E
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Anyone with the same experience?
we are going through this on the laboratory, we quiet don't know how to treat it but I want to be the first to figure it out...
I know what it is but we need to solve how to make it stay on a normal radioactive rate before it goes critical (acourding to the drill of course).

THX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intelligent-E said:
Anyone with the same experience?
we are going through this on the laboratory, we quiet don't know how to treat it but I want to be the first to figure it out...
I know what it is but we need to solve how to make it stay on a normal radioactive rate before it goes critical (acourding to the drill of course).

THX
Try to clarify what you are concerned about. You make references to "this" and "it", without explaining what they are.
 
Half-life is the period of time, for a substance undergoing decay, to decrease by half. The name originally was used to describe a characteristic of unstable atoms (radioactive decay), but may apply to any quantity which follows a set-rate decay.

The original term, dating to 1907, was "half-life period", which was later shortened to "half-life" sometime in the early 1950s.[1]

Half-lives are very often used to describe quantities undergoing exponential decay—for example radioactive decay—where the half-life is constant over the whole life of the decay, and is a characteristic unit (a natural unit of scale) for the exponential decay equation. However, a half-life can also be defined for non-exponential decay processes, although in these cases the half-life varies throughout the decay process. For a general introduction and description of exponential decay, see the article exponential decay. For a general introduction and description of non-exponential decay, see the article rate law.

The converse of half-life is doubling time.

The table at right shows the reduction of a quantity in terms of the number of half-lives elapsed
 
Intelligent-E said:
Half-life is the period of time, for a substance undergoing decay, to decrease by half. The name originally was used to describe a characteristic of unstable atoms (radioactive decay), but may apply to any quantity which follows a set-rate decay.

The original term, dating to 1907, was "half-life period", which was later shortened to "half-life" sometime in the early 1950s.[1]

Half-lives are very often used to describe quantities undergoing exponential decay—for example radioactive decay—where the half-life is constant over the whole life of the decay, and is a characteristic unit (a natural unit of scale) for the exponential decay equation. However, a half-life can also be defined for non-exponential decay processes, although in these cases the half-life varies throughout the decay process. For a general introduction and description of exponential decay, see the article exponential decay. For a general introduction and description of non-exponential decay, see the article rate law.

The converse of half-life is doubling time.

The table at right shows the reduction of a quantity in terms of the number of half-lives elapsed

Cutting and pasting that information is not helping us. And it may violate copyright law, depending on where you got it. In order to copy and paste information like that, you should include a link to where you got it from.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top