Half-Plane in R^3: Explanation and Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Describe in words the surface whose equation is given by theta = pi/4

2. The attempt at a solution


It is a fairly simple question, but I'm just trying to understand why this is considered a half-plane that exists for x that is greater than or equal to 0. There are no restriction on r or z. Given this, cannot r be negative? Wouldn't this make a full-plane and let it extend for x less than 0? I just don't quite see why it cannot have the point (-1, pi/4, 0), for example, which would be present for x less than 0. Any feedback is always appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:

Homework Statement



Describe in words the surface whose equation is given by theta = pi/4

2. The attempt at a solution


It is a fairly simple question, but I'm just trying to understand why this is considered a half-plane that exists for x that is greater than or equal to 0. There are no restriction on r or z. Given this, cannot r be negative? Wouldn't this make a full-plane and let it extend for x less than 0? I just don't quite see why it cannot have the point (-1, pi/4, 0), for example, which would be present for x less than 0. Any feedback is always appreciated!

First of all, you haven't told us what coordinate system you are using. ##\theta = \frac \pi 4## makes sense in 2D polar coordinates, 3D cylindrical coordinates, and in spherical coordinates. In spherical coordinates it might be a plane or cone, depending on what convention you use for ##\theta##.

But, to answer your question, you seem to understand what is going on perfectly well. Texts are inconsistent about whether or not ##r<0## is used in polar or cylindrical coordinates. If you are using the convention ##r\ge 0## you get a half plane as you say, and if ##r## is allowed to go negative you get the whole plane, as you understand. One problem with disallowing negative values of ##r## is that you don't see all 3 leaves of the rose ##r = \sin(3\theta)## for ##0\le\theta\le \pi##.

I wouldn't worry too much about this if I were you since you understand it just fine.
 
  • Like
Likes MathewsMD
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top