Hamilton Operator for particle on a circle -- Matrix representation....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian for a particle on a circle is represented as ## \hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2mR^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2} ##, where the azimuthal angle is the only degree of freedom. A suitable basis for matrix representation includes the eigenfunctions of the operator, which can be expressed as exponential functions with imaginary exponents. The matrix elements of an operator ## \hat S ## are defined as ## S_{mn}=\langle \psi_m|\hat S|\psi_n\rangle ##, and can be computed using the integral ## S_{mn}=\int_{0}^{2\pi} \phi_m(\phi) \hat S \phi_n(\phi) d\phi ##. The resulting matrix representation is infinite-dimensional due to the infinite number of eigenfunctions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically Hamiltonians.
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their application in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of differential operators and their matrix representations.
  • Basic grasp of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of Hamiltonians in polar coordinates.
  • Study the properties of eigenfunctions and their role in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the application of integral calculus in calculating matrix elements of operators.
  • Investigate the implications of infinite-dimensional matrices in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in mathematical physics, and students studying quantum mechanics who are interested in the matrix representation of operators in polar coordinates.

JonnyMaddox
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Hey JO.

The Hamiltonian is:
[itex]H= \frac{p_{x}^{2}+p_{y}^{2}}{2m}[/itex]

In quantum Mechanics:
[itex]\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}})[/itex]

In polar coordinates:
[itex]\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}( \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \phi^{2}})[/itex]

Now I want to write this operator in matrix form. What is an appropriate basis? I thought a good would be {sin(x),sin(2x),sin(3x),...,sin(nx)} Now how do I do that in a two dimensional space? What is the basis for that? Something like {sin(x),sin(y),...sin(nx),sin(ny)} ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Hamiltonians are wrong. The first two Hamiltonians are for a free particle in two dimensions, not for a particle on a circle. Anyway, its not reasonable to do this in Cartesian coordinates.
Going to polar coordinates, and noticing that there is only one degree of freedom(the azimuthal angle), the Hamiltonian is ## \hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2mR^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2} ##.

Now consider the set of basis vectors ##\{|\psi_n\rangle\} ##. The matrix elements of an operator ## \hat S ## w.r.t. this set of basis vectors is defined as ## S_{mn}=\langle \psi_m|\hat S|\psi_n\rangle ##. The basis vectors don't have to be related to the operator but a convenient basis for this job is a basis in which the matrix ##S_{mn}## is diagonal. So the set of eigenvectors of the operator ## \hat S ##(##\hat S|\psi_m\rangle=\lambda_m|\psi_m\rangle##) is a convenient basis.

When the operator is a differential operator and the vectors are functions, the matrix elements can be calculated using an integral ## S_{mn}=\int_{\zeta_1}^{\zeta_2} \phi_m(\zeta) \hat S \phi_n(\zeta) d\zeta ##. For the above Hamiltonian, ##\zeta## is the azimuthal angle ##\phi## and the range of integration is 0 to 2π and the eigenfunctions are exponential functions with imaginary exponents which can also be written as the sum of sines and cosines if you want. Note that there are an infinite number of eigenfunctions and so the matrix ## H_{mn} ## will be infinite dimensional.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
683
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K