(Hard QM) Consider the double well potential with delta func

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a double well potential characterized by a delta function. The original poster seeks to find bound state energies, odd and even solutions, and their graphical representations based on the given potential function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of boundary conditions and the resulting system of equations. There is an emphasis on the need to derive a matrix representation of the equations to find the energy eigenvalue equation. Some participants question how to construct the matrix from the equations provided.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the mathematical framework needed to approach the problem. Some participants have suggested reducing the complexity of the system by recognizing the symmetry in the wavefunctions, while others are clarifying the steps needed to form the matrix for the equations. A participant has indicated progress by obtaining a sensible answer through algebraic manipulation.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the method to derive the energy eigenvalue equation and the construction of the matrix, indicating a need for further clarification on these points.

NucEngMajor
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the double well potential with two wells separated by delta function in middle.

V(x) = V0 > 0 for x<-a and x>a
0 for -a<x<0 and 0<x<a
αδ for x =0
1. Find Bound state energies
2. Find odd solns and their eigenvalue equation. Give solns in graphical form
3. Repeat 2. for even
4. Plot two lowest order even and odd soln

Homework Equations


S.E

The Attempt at a Solution


I wrote down BC's noting discontinuity at delta and obtained 6 equations (think they are right?). Prof said to use the fact that the determinant of system must vanish to get energy eigenvalue equation. I don't know how to go about this. I know the other way would be incredibly long and tedious.
Aexp(-la) = Csin(-ka)+Dcos(-ka)
lAexp(-la) = Ckcos(-ka)-Dksin(-ka)
Gexp(-la) = Esin(ka) + Fcos(ka)
-lGexp(-la) = Ekcos(ka) - Fksin(ka)
D=F
k(E-C)=2mαF/h^2 (h is "h bar")[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a system of six linear equations with six unknowns (A, C, D, E, F, and G). In matrix form, you'll have ##M\vec{x} = 0## where ##\vec{x} = (A, C, D, E, F, G)^T##. If the determinant of ##M## is non-zero, the only solution is the trivial solution ##\vec{x}=0##, which isn't what you want, so you need ##\det(M)=0##. So start by figuring out what ##M## is.
 
vela said:
You have a system of six linear equations with six unknowns (A, C, D, E, F, and G). In matrix form, you'll have ##M\vec{x} = 0## where ##\vec{x} = (A, C, D, E, F, G)^T##. If the determinant of ##M## is non-zero, the only solution is the trivial solution ##\vec{x}=0##, which isn't what you want, so you need ##\det(M)=0##. So start by figuring out what ##M## is.
How does one go about constructing M from this? Not looking for answer, but I quite honestly don't know how to start...
 
The same way you convert, for example, the equations
\begin{align*}
x' &= x \cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\
y' &= x \sin\theta + y \cos\theta
\end{align*}
to
$$\begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix}$$
 
NucEngMajor,

You can greatly reduce the number of unknowns by using the fact that your wavefunctions are either even or odd. If you know the wavefunction for x ≥ 0, you automatically know the wavefunction for x < 0. Then, if you want to use the matrix approach, your matrix will be just 3 x 3 instead of 6 x 6.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
Ended up using algebra and getting a sensible answer. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K