(Hard QM) Consider the double well potential with delta func

NucEngMajor
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the double well potential with two wells separated by delta function in middle.

V(x) = V0 > 0 for x<-a and x>a
0 for -a<x<0 and 0<x<a
αδ for x =0
1. Find Bound state energies
2. Find odd solns and their eigenvalue equation. Give solns in graphical form
3. Repeat 2. for even
4. Plot two lowest order even and odd soln

Homework Equations


S.E

The Attempt at a Solution


I wrote down BC's noting discontinuity at delta and obtained 6 equations (think they are right?). Prof said to use the fact that the determinant of system must vanish to get energy eigenvalue equation. I don't know how to go about this. I know the other way would be incredibly long and tedious.
Aexp(-la) = Csin(-ka)+Dcos(-ka)
lAexp(-la) = Ckcos(-ka)-Dksin(-ka)
Gexp(-la) = Esin(ka) + Fcos(ka)
-lGexp(-la) = Ekcos(ka) - Fksin(ka)
D=F
k(E-C)=2mαF/h^2 (h is "h bar")[/B]
 
on Phys.org
You have a system of six linear equations with six unknowns (A, C, D, E, F, and G). In matrix form, you'll have ##M\vec{x} = 0## where ##\vec{x} = (A, C, D, E, F, G)^T##. If the determinant of ##M## is non-zero, the only solution is the trivial solution ##\vec{x}=0##, which isn't what you want, so you need ##\det(M)=0##. So start by figuring out what ##M## is.
 
vela said:
You have a system of six linear equations with six unknowns (A, C, D, E, F, and G). In matrix form, you'll have ##M\vec{x} = 0## where ##\vec{x} = (A, C, D, E, F, G)^T##. If the determinant of ##M## is non-zero, the only solution is the trivial solution ##\vec{x}=0##, which isn't what you want, so you need ##\det(M)=0##. So start by figuring out what ##M## is.
How does one go about constructing M from this? Not looking for answer, but I quite honestly don't know how to start...
 
The same way you convert, for example, the equations
\begin{align*}
x' &= x \cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\
y' &= x \sin\theta + y \cos\theta
\end{align*}
to
$$\begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix}$$
 
NucEngMajor,

You can greatly reduce the number of unknowns by using the fact that your wavefunctions are either even or odd. If you know the wavefunction for x ≥ 0, you automatically know the wavefunction for x < 0. Then, if you want to use the matrix approach, your matrix will be just 3 x 3 instead of 6 x 6.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
Ended up using algebra and getting a sensible answer. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K